debian kernel 2.6.24-1 output

2008-02-01 Thread Eugen Dedu
Hi, ACPI: EC: EC description table is found, configuring boot EC ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored ACPI: DMI System Vendor: Apple Inc. ACPI: DMI Product Name: MacBookPro3,1 ACPI: DMI Product Version: 1.0 ACPI: DMI Board Name:

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 23:36 +0100, Éric Piel wrote: Hi, Just a few comments for now as I don't have much time until this weekend. 30/01/08 18:27, Thomas Renninger wrote/a écrit: : On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 23:39 -0500, Len Brown wrote: : Probably it is best to forward the original patch w/

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:17 -0500, Len Brown wrote: In fact, I added the array some time ago. Not sure whether the latest Version of Eric/Markus can also load several DSDT/SSDTs? Maybe you found a more elegant way? Nope. On the website (http://gaugusch.at/kernel.shtml) you can just

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Eric Piel
Thomas Renninger wrote: About Len's points 1-4: 1. tainted bit needs to be set when a DSDT override is used. (this is common both to the new patch and the current override method) 2. upon setting the tainted bit, print a BIG FAT WARNING that this is not a supported configuration. 3.

dmidecode for HP Pavilion dv9413cl

2008-02-01 Thread rvJJax
Host OS: openSuSE 10.3 linux version 2.6.22.16-0.1-default dmidecode Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Thomas Renninger wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:17 -0500, Len Brown wrote: [skipped] Those tables have the same OEM id then the original ones, right? Tables with the same OEM id (the original ones) should get ignored later automatically. IIRC I had some problems with dynamically loaded

Re: Need to replace one patch in suspend branch

2008-02-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Len Brown wrote: On Monday 28 January 2008 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi Len, Would it be possible to replace commit a04ca6718960e842624833a01dbd5f10f38f5af1 Suspend: Testing facility (rev. 2) in the suspend branch with the appended patch?

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:07 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Thomas Renninger wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:17 -0500, Len Brown wrote: [skipped] Those tables have the same OEM id then the original ones, right? Tables with the same OEM id (the original ones) should get ignored

Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression

2008-02-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[Relevant CCs added.] On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, I encountered oops on my laptop Lenovo T61 and dock. If I press undock on the dock, I got the following oops: [79721.755165] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0034000e [79721.755165]

Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
On Friday 01 February 2008 09:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [Relevant CCs added.] On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, I encountered oops on my laptop Lenovo T61 and dock. If I press undock on the dock, I got the following oops: this worked in 2.6.24? You

Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression

2008-02-01 Thread Lukas Hejtmanek
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: this worked in 2.6.24? At least in 2.6.24-rc8 seemed to be OK, for the first time, I encountered the bug in 2.6.24-git4. 2.6.24-git6 seemed to be OK. 2.6.24-git9 is not. You are running the dock driver in both cases? I use thinkpad

[GIT PATCH] suspend patches for 2.6.25-rc0

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Hi Linus, please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git suspend This will update the files shown below. thanks! -Len ps. individual patches are available on linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org and a consolidated plain patch is available here:

[patch 20/27] ACPICA: fix acpi-cpufreq boot crash due to _PSD return-by-reference

2008-02-01 Thread Greg KH
2.6.22-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Bob Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] patch 152c300d007c70c4a1847dad39ecdaba22e7d457 in mainline. Changed resolution of named references in packages Fixed a problem with the Package operator where

Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [GIT PATCH] thinkpad-acpi patches for 2.6.25 (replaces batch 1)

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
On Friday 25 January 2008 14:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Len, Given that there are four cleanup patches in the batch, I didn't even attempt to bother with checkpatch on anything before the some checkpatch fluff patch. There are, for example, no tab/space problems in the final

Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Applied. thanks, -Len On Tuesday 25 December 2007 21:03, Matthew Garrett wrote: The sysfs backlight class provides no mechanism for querying the acceptable brightness for a backlight. The ACPI spec states that values are only valid if they are reported as available by the firmware. Since

Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
On Monday 28 January 2008 00:10, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:25:50 + Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:00:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: - Create a new /sys node with a new name which has the new semantics. The semantics are the

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: video: introduce new flag for enabling/disabling ACPI video actions upon brightness switch notifications

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Applied. thanks, -Len On Friday 25 January 2008 01:47, Zhang Rui wrote: From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] Introduce new module parameter for brightness control. brightness_switch_enabled is set by default which means nothing changes upon brightness switch events. When

Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: video: prevent ACPI video actions upon display switch notifications

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Applied. thanks, -Len On Friday 25 January 2008 01:47, Zhang Rui wrote: From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] Display switching via ACPI control methods are known to work on none platform AFAIK. And graphics people want to control the display switching all by themselves. Prevent ACPI from

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI: create ACPI notifier chain

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Applied. thanks, -Len On Friday 25 January 2008 01:48, Zhang Rui wrote: From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] This patch is needed by the kernel mode graphics drivers. Create an ACPI notifier chain so that they can get notified upon hotkey events. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: video: call ACPI notifier chain for ACPI video notifications

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Applied. thanks, -Len On Friday 25 January 2008 01:48, Zhang Rui wrote: From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call notifier chain for display/brightness switch events. The kernel mode graphics driver is interested in this. Sign-off-by: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/acpi/video.c

Re: [PATCH 0/10] generic thermal management

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
series applied to acpi-test. thanks, -Len On Thursday 17 January 2008 02:50, Zhang Rui wrote: Hi, all, This patch series introduces a new generic thermal sysfs driver which provides a set of interfaces for thermal zone devices (sensors) and thermal cooling devices (fan, processor...) to

Re: [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: Battery hotplug support

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
Series applied to acpi-test thanks, -Len On Wednesday 16 January 2008 20:19, Zhang Rui wrote: Hi, all, This patch series is for battery hotplug support. Please refer to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2884 Patch 01 flushes kacpi_notify_wq before removing the notify handler

Re: [PATCH] Override DSDT and SSDTs via initramfs

2008-02-01 Thread Len Brown
On Friday 01 February 2008 04:53, Thomas Renninger wrote: That gives you complete and total control over what AML gets run I doubt that. You said there can be any number of SSDTs. If you know what you are doing..., but how do you explain someone in a bug that he has to collect all SSDTs