Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2001-05-11 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #34 Fri, 11 May 01 23:13:02 EDT Contents: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (GreyCloud) Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (GreyCloud) Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (GreyCloud) Re: Microsoft standards... (was Re: Windows

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2001-04-07 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #33Sun, 8 Apr 01 01:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: lack of linux billionaires explained in one easy message (Bob Hauck) Re: XP = eXPerimental (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=) Re: An end to legacy hardware? (Axel Harvey) Re: TeX pdf output was Re

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2001-02-24 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #32 Sat, 24 Feb 01 05:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Microsoft seeks government help to stop Linux (Aaron Kulkis) Re: Microsoft seeks government help to stop Linux (Aaron Kulkis) Re: Something Seemingly Simple. (Richard Heathfield) Re: Where is suse

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2001-01-13 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #31 Sat, 13 Jan 01 21:13:05 EST Contents: Re: Ed is the standard editor (TTK here..) Re: Why does Win2k always fail in running time? (The Ghost In The Machine) Re: One case where Linux has the edge ("Nigel Feltham") Re: Windows 2000

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-11-26 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #30 Sun, 26 Nov 00 13:13:03 EST Contents: Re: C++ is very alive! (Charlie Ebert) Re: C++ is very alive! (Charlie Ebert) Re: C++ is very alive! (Pedro Sam) Re: C++ is very alive! (Charlie Ebert) Re: C++ is very alive! (mlw) Re: Windoze 2000

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-10-04 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #29Wed, 4 Oct 00 07:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Richard) Re: Double standard? (Chris Sherlock) Re: How low can they go...? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: What kind of WinTroll Idiot

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-08-16 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #28 Wed, 16 Aug 00 21:13:06 EDT Contents: Re: Linsux as a desktop platform (T. Max Devlin) Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (T. Max Devlin) Re: Richard Stallman's Politics (was: Linux is awesome! (T. Max Devlin) Re: Would a M$ Voluntary

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-07-03 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #27Mon, 3 Jul 00 13:13:06 EDT Contents: Re: We WANT different enviroments (Was: Linux, easy to use? (The Ghost In The Machine) Re: Why Linux, and X.11 when MacOS 'X' is around the corner? (The Ghost In The Machine) Re: Where did all my

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-05-10 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #26 Wed, 10 May 00 13:13:06 EDT Contents: Re: What have you done? (Leslie Mikesell) Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software (WickedDyno) Re: Microsoft: STAY THE FUCK OFF THE NET!!! (JEDIDIAH) Re: Why only Microsoft should

Linux-Advocacy Digest #442

2000-02-29 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #442, Volume #25 Tue, 29 Feb 00 14:13:09 EST Contents: Re: 63000 bugs in W2K # of bugs in Debian (George Richard Russell) Re: A Trip to the Store (George Richard Russell) Re: IE on UNIX (Brian Langenberger) Re: Binary compatibility: what kind of crack