Linux-Advocacy Digest #151, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 02:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Donovan
Rebbechi)
Re: How low can they
Linux-Advocacy Digest #152, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 02:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: How low can they go...? (Mike Byrns)
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Sherman Act vaguery
Linux-Advocacy Digest #153, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 04:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (2:1)
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT (Alan Baker)
Re: How low can they go...? ("James Stutts")
Re: How low can
Linux-Advocacy Digest #154, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 07:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: How low can they go...? ("Simon Cooke")
Re: How low can they go...? ("Simon Cooke")
Re: Unix more secure, huh? ("Paul 'Z' Ewande©")
Re: Unix rules in Redmond ("Paul 'Z' Ewande©")
Re: Malloy
Linux-Advocacy Digest #155, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 09:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Inferior Engineering of the Win32 Platform (IE for Linux) (Peter Hayes)
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) ("Nigel
Feltham")
Re: Because programmers hate users
Linux-Advocacy Digest #156, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 11:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Never tell me again that Windows is easy to install!!! It's a lie! ("Ingemar
Lundin")
Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Unix rules in Redmond (Gary Hallock)
Re: How low can they
Linux-Advocacy Digest #158, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 14:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: How low can they go...? ("JS/PL")
Re: [OT] Public v. Private Schools (Jack Troughton)
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT (dc)
Re: Never tell me again that Windows is easy to
Linux-Advocacy Digest #159, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 14:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?)
Re: Another "feature" in IE discovered. (D. Spider)
Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux
Linux-Advocacy Digest #160, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 15:13:08 EDT
Contents:
Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Richard)
Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Re: Unix rules in Redmond
Re: Never tell me again that Windows is
Linux-Advocacy Digest #162, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 18:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Richard)
Re: How low can they go...? ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("James Stutts")
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #161, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 18:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: "Real Unix" Vs Linux ("Rev. Don Kool")
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Paul 'Z' Ewande©")
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Paul 'Z' Ewande©")
Re: Because
Linux-Advocacy Digest #164, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 21:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: [OT] Public v. Private Schools (Bob Germer)
Re: [OT] Public v. Private Schools (Jason Bowen)
Re: Never tell me again that Windows is easy to install!!! It's a lie! ("Erik
Funkenbusch")
Re: Id
Linux-Advocacy Digest #165, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 22:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Chad Myers")
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Chad Myers")
Re: [OT] Public v. Private Schools ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Because
Linux-Advocacy Digest #166, Volume #29 Sun, 17 Sep 00 22:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Unix more secure, huh? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Joseph T. Adams")
Re: GPL freedom (Andrew Carpenter)
Re: [OT] Public v. Private Schools
Linux-Advocacy Digest #167, Volume #29 Mon, 18 Sep 00 00:13:08 EDT
Contents:
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT (Chad Irby)
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Chad Myers")
Re: Unix more secure, huh? ("Chad Myers")
Re: [OT] Public v. Private
Linux-Advocacy Digest #168, Volume #29 Mon, 18 Sep 00 01:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2451800 (Marty)
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("JS/PL")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) (Jack Troughton)
Re: [OT] Public
16 matches
Mail list logo
