Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #34 Sat, 12 May 01 10:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux is paralyzed before it even starts ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux (Roy Culley)
Re: To Erik: What is Wordperfect missing? (Roy Culley)
Re: W2K/IIS proves itself
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #33Sun, 8 Apr 01 12:13:02 EDT
Contents:
Re: lack of linux billionaires explained in one easy message ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Read this clueless Linux advocates... (Goldhammer)
Re: t. max devlin: kook ("Ayende Rahien")
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #32 Sat, 24 Feb 01 11:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: RTFM at M$ (Brent R)
Re: RTFM at M$ (Norman D. Megill)
Re: Something Seemingly Simple. ("Edward Rosten")
Re: RTFM at M$ (Brent R)
Re: It's just too easy (Chris Ahlstrom)
Re: Does a
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #31 Sun, 14 Jan 01 06:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Linux is INFERIOR to Windows (R.E.Ballard ( Rex Ballard ))
Re: OS-X GUI on Linux? ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Linux is INFERIOR
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #30 Sun, 26 Nov 00 17:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: KDE2 (Matthias Warkus)
Re: Windoze 2000 - just as shitty as ever ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: KDE2 (matt newell)
Re: Mandrake 7.2 Quick Review ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Anyo
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #29Wed, 4 Oct 00 14:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux and Free Internet? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Another M$ Troll (droll?) (Jacques Guy)
Re: Migration -- NT costing please :-) ("Drestin Black")
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #28 Thu, 17 Aug 00 05:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard
saysLinux growth stagnating (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #27Tue, 4 Jul 00 05:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linsux as a desktop platform (Peter Ammon)
Re: LIE-nux is SUPPOST to destroy data (was: Re: This is a Troll, do not resond
(was Re: Linux is junk)) (Pete Goodwin)
Re: LIE-nux is SUPPOST to destroy
Linux-Advocacy Digest #449, Volume #26 Thu, 11 May 00 00:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: This is Bullsh^%T!!! ("Christopher Smith")
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to cr
