Guys, I read about JACK Session, tried it out. It does seem very capable.
And if more apps add support (which, as people say in this discussion, is
not that difficult), wouldn't JACK Session be a good, stable way to restore
sessions? After all, JACK is a basic thing for Linux Audio and adding
Am 4. April 2012 08:11 schrieb Louigi Verona louigi.ver...@gmail.com:
Am I missing something here?
Yes,
search the archives.
or visit
http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/user/emrum/jack_session_2_draft
to see,
what NSM tries to improve, by imposing some meaningful rules.
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
restrictiveness, so to speak:
- level 0 :- clients just store/retrieve their own private state from a
supplied and independent session sub-directory; no GUI File menu
On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
restrictiveness, so to speak:
- level 0 :- clients just store/retrieve their own private state from a
supplied and independent
On 04/04/2012 02:22 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
restrictiveness, so to speak:
- level 0 :- clients just store/retrieve their own
Am 4. April 2012 11:18 schrieb rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com:
How much more effort will it be in terms of coding, to implement 'level-1'
versus 'level-0'?
For anyone who prefers to work with apps-do-whatever-they-want appraoch
or
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:25:02PM +, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
For anyone who prefers to work with apps-do-whatever-they-want appraoch
or we-have-zero-to-X-support-levels-so-you-dont-know-what-to-expect ,
there are alternatives: JackSession, Lash, Ladish.
I would prefere at least *one* SM
On 04/04/2012 03:51 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
if ever I add session management to any
app then that app will obey the NSM rules or very similar
ones if the session manager is not NSM - it is the obvious
thing to do if you want something that works.
Could you elaborate your reasons for this,
On 04/04/2012 01:35 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/04/2012 02:22 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
restrictiveness, so to speak:
-
On 04/04/2012 04:39 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Another question. If you compare NSM level 0 (!) with JackSession. Which
session manager do you prefer and why?
well, NSM level 0 adds nothing to what JSM already delivers. sorry for
the noise :)
the once self-called uber-procrastinator says:
On 04/04/2012 04:55 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/04/2012 04:39 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Another question. If you compare NSM level 0 (!) with JackSession. Which
session manager do you prefer and why?
well, NSM level 0 adds nothing to what JSM already delivers. sorry for
the noise :)
On 04/04/2012 03:55 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/04/2012 04:39 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Another question. If you compare NSM level 0 (!) with JackSession. Which
session manager do you prefer and why?
well, NSM level 0 adds nothing to what JSM already delivers. sorry for
the noise :)
Hi guys,
I want to buy a usb sound card with the following specs:
16 input channels :
at least 8 Mic ins,
the rest line ins, intrument ins or ADAT ins (optical)
no spdif
output channels:
8 would be nice but not a must
price: 300-350 €
I have these on my list:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Rui Nuno Capela rn...@rncbc.org wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
restrictiveness, so to speak:
- level 0 :- clients
On 04/04/2012 05:46 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 04/04/2012 03:55 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/04/2012 04:39 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Another question. If you compare NSM level 0 (!) with JackSession.
Which
session manager do you prefer and why?
well, NSM level 0 adds nothing to
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:37:59PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Could you elaborate your reasons for this, for those who don't see this
as obvious?
I could. But it wouldn't help anyone.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream,
On 04/04/2012 05:19 PM, J. Liles wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Rui Nuno Capela rn...@rncbc.org
mailto:rn...@rncbc.org wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
now, i could suggest NSM API to be
On 04/04/2012 05:19 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
... On that topic I conclude that Qjackctl doesn't support infra
clients by purpose and that I don't see it happen that there will be
another GUI who does support in the near future.
wait, it's not by purpose but just overlooked ok?
On 04/04/2012 08:51 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 04/04/2012 05:19 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
... On that topic I conclude that Qjackctl doesn't support infra
clients by purpose and that I don't see it happen that there will be
another GUI who does support in the near future.
wait, it's
On 04/04/2012 09:59 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
But of course, this are not the only reason to prefer one SM above the
other. As mentioned in my previous mails, there are arguments for me atm
to say that NSM gives a user more then JackSession (even with the
hypothetical level-0). NSM seems to
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:19:57AM -0700, J. Liles wrote:
Are you seriously saying that the equivalent of doing:
if ( nsm_is_active )
save_here( file );
else
save_there( file );
Would require a complete rewrite and overhaul of your application? Say you
don't want to do
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:59 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
[...]
I think it's essential to the discussion to get the cards on the
table, so everybody can make up his own mind and decides which SM is the
best solution for the Linuxaudio session puzzle. It would be nice if we
could reach
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:19:57AM -0700, J. Liles wrote:
Are you seriously saying that the equivalent of doing:
if ( nsm_is_active )
save_here( file );
else
save_there( file );
Would require
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, J. Liles malnour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.orgwrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:19:57AM -0700, J. Liles wrote:
Are you seriously saying that the equivalent of doing:
if ( nsm_is_active )
On 04/04/2012 11:22 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:59 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote: [...]
I think it's essential to the discussion to get the cards on the
table, so everybody can make up his own mind and decides which SM
is the best solution for the Linuxaudio session
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:04 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
[...]
ardour gets all its stuff under one own session directory, on a per
session/project basis, iirc just like NSM mandates,
bbbuut...:) making that one and the same directory as from an
outsider/independent session manager
26 matches
Mail list logo
