On Tuesday 28 April 2009 17:59:36 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.04.09 23:36, Fons Adriaensen (f...@kokkinizita.net) wrote:
Hello all,
I'm Running F10 and I have these lines in /etc/modprobe.conf:
options snd cards_limit=4
alias snd-card-0 snd_intel8x0
alias snd-card-1
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 19:34:52 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.04.09 00:18, Fons Adriaensen (f...@kokkinizita.net) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:59:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.04.09 23:36, Fons Adriaensen (f...@kokkinizita.net) wrote:
Hello all,
On Sunday 17 May 2009 05:24:04 Christian wrote:
Fons Adriaensen schrieb:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:50:55AM +0200, MarcO'Chapeau wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 00:31:41 +0200, Fons Adriaensen
f...@kokkinizita.net
wrote:
A request to the jackdmp and qjackctl devs:
PLEASE REMOVE THAT
On Sunday 17 May 2009 14:04:54 Stéphane Letz wrote:
The point is that when compiled in D-Bus mode, libjack behaves
differently regarding the way it start the server: it does not use
the fork+exec mode anymore but call the D-Bus service to start the
server. This simple change is the
On Monday 18 May 2009 05:49:01 Jan Weil wrote:
If it is indeed a
compile time option, the design is flawed IMHO. Generally, the new
control API sounds like a good idea but why can't the new features be
exposed as new command line tools without dbus dependency per default?
So you want the dbus
On Monday 18 May 2009 12:34:41 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:10:45PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
the issue that qjackctl could consider is not jackdbus, or dbus in
general. its the JACK control API that was discussed at LAC 2008.
right now, qjackctl simply claims to know
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 05:44:13 Stéphane Letz wrote:
Le 19 mai 09 à 11:30, Fons Adriaensen a écrit :
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:38:24AM +0200, Stéphane Letz wrote:
5) Another idea would be improve the choice of auto-start
strategy by
providing a runtime choice for that: a way for the
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 15:03:28 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:06:05PM -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
I think what he was saying was that jackdbus would check for jackd in
$PATH and complain bitterly / refuse to sintall / whatever. Not that it
would try and control what $PATH
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 16:13:10 Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Both are examples of braindead ways to do things,
both originate from the same source. Dbus ties
jackd to the desktop and is just one more example
of the same insane evolution.
Not true. D-Bus-based jackd
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 23:05:51 Danni Coy wrote:
Learning new ways of doing things takes time and effort.
Outside of this discussion, I think this is an important thing to keep in
mind. Let me explain it this way:
It irks me when people change things gratuitously and force me to spend my
time
On Sunday 19 July 2009 13:24:25 Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
To paraphrase the GPL, the source code must be available along with the
binary in the same/normal medium of distribution or a written offer
(valid for three years) must accompany the
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 16:16:11 Chris Cannam wrote:
Uh, that's a lot of A, B and X... you mean a company provides GPL'd
code to another, for money, for use in-house or in a service, on the
tacit understanding that it will go no further?
You don't need that understanding. You just need it to
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:03 Simon Jenkins wrote:
Until and unless you have Bob's preview source files
with GPL headers all present and correct, you don't have a license for
the mods in that code.
Huh?
If I get a binary from someone that claims to be GPL, the GPL surely gives me
the
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 Simon Jenkins wrote:
He
SHOULD have licensed his modifications under the GPL but he DIDN'T
(remember?) which means you don't have a license for the modifications.
Where do you see this breaking down?
Let's take a few made up examples:
I write a program
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:18 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Whether he wanted to or not, use of GPL code makes it GPL code.
I don't think this is correct. It would only mean that if he were not to GPL
the code he would be in violation of the original author's copyrights (this
is a generic he
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 02:53:35 Arnout Engelen wrote:
You cannot claim someone failed to distribute software under the GPL, and
at the same time take said software and excercise the rights that *would*
have been granted to you *if* the software was distributed under the GPL.
I think you
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 08:20:18 Chris Cannam wrote:
An appropriate remedy for the problem might be for you
to ensure that you comply with my license (e.g. publish under the GPL)
or desist from publication, but your users can't enact that remedy for
themselves.
Chris
Chris,
I think this
On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:04:05 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
The guy removed the preview version from his website.
You don't have to release the source of development versions.
Right. Unless you distribute the development versions then:
You don't have to make your source available, but people
On Saturday 25 July 2009 18:14:45 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Of course this becomes much more hairy when there are more than one
copyright holders.
Which seems to be the case in this instance and why this all came up but I
just got back on the net and may have misunderstood or missed something.
On Saturday 25 July 2009 19:20:35 Arnold Krille wrote:
If someone says software A is released as GPL and doesn't release the
source (upon request) its not GPL.
Why not? Careful now. If I give you an original binary of mine and a GPL
license to it, do you want to have the rights to my program
On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
It does not make any difference whether the copyright holder of
Impro-Visor declares it as GPL or not. Once you use GPL code in
your application it too must be GPL. That is the viral nature of GPL.
Again, FSF and the FAQ on GPL. Read it.
On Sunday 02 August 2009 08:25:19 Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings,
Just out of curiosity, how many participants in this discussion are
copyright holders ? How many of you have published works under copyright ?
+1 people
+many works
but surely this is almost a trick question even though it may
On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:41:57 Arnold Krille wrote:
Standard contracts for employees include that the copyrights of their
productive work during company time is property of the company. And that
includes software...
Arnold
OK, but what about the copyrights of their non productive work
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:26:19 Raymond Martin wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:05:41 drew Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:18 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Whether he wanted to or not, use of GPL code makes it GPL code.
I don't think this is correct. It would only mean
On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:33:58 Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:58:30 you wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 00:41:23 Esben Stien wrote:
Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net writes:
Rack mount is preferred but not essential.
What are you
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:05:17 Raymond Martin wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 08:59:31 drew Roberts wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:26:19 Raymond Martin wrote:
This was all in the context of distribution. Perhaps this was not
clear.
No, it was clear. The GPL cannot make
On Thursday 06 August 2009 14:46:18 Raymond Martin wrote:
What possible counter-argument can there be left?
You didn't read the GPL? You didn't understand it? You thought the GPL was
like the BSD? Make some up.
I do get you point. Just don't agree yet. But I don't think it is worth it at
this
On Thursday 06 August 2009 20:34:37 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
because of a similar copyright law
that someone from the list described and it seems to be the same for the
USA and nearly every country,
If I understood what I have read in the past correctly and am remembering it
correctly, the FSF
On Friday 07 August 2009 13:10:50 Raymond Martin wrote:
Show me where I have done something wrong. I am not seizing anything
by taking what is freely given. Make sense. I showed in another post that
there is nothing wrong with decompilation under GPL
I don't see you as having done something
On Saturday 08 August 2009 06:45:25 Raymond Martin wrote:
Trademarks in FOSS are just as bad as
software patents. Too bad most people do not get that.
Ah. Trademarks can be used properly with Free Software. For the benefit of the
trademark holder's users rather than for the benefit of the
On Saturday 08 August 2009 12:34:26 Thomas Vecchione wrote:
he standard is likelihood of confusion. To be more specific, the use of a
trademark in connection with the sale of a good constitutes infringement if
it is likely to cause consumer confusion as to the source of those goods or
as to
On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide
that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
forking the project when
On Saturday 08 August 2009 09:59:45 Raymond Martin wrote:
In fact, you will find that some experts on these matters always recommend
to openly welcome forks
Personally, when it comes to my stuff, I do.
I tend to do more on the artistic side than on the code side and run into what
I consider
On Sunday 09 August 2009 02:11:46 Jeff McClintock wrote:
Chris Cannam
... but it's probably
illegal and certainly unethical to redistribute someone else's work
without attribution (a basic necessity of copyright which the GPL
doesn't disclaim).
The BSD license originally required
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:18:45 Dennis Schulmeister wrote:
That kind of application already exists. It's called a tiling window
manager. ;) DWM is one I sometimes use although I never tried it for
audio work.
I think what is being asked for is more like a regular window manager with a
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 10:37:18 you wrote:
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:18:45 Dennis Schulmeister wrote:
That kind of application already exists. It's called a tiling window
manager. ;) DWM is one I sometimes use although I never tried it for
audio work.
I think what is
On Thursday 15 October 2009 04:33:26 f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:55:16AM +0100, victor wrote:
that makes sense now, so someone jumped the gun.
Some time ago I learned on this list the expression
'jumping the shark' - IIRC it was Paul Davis using
it. But what is
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 13:31:24 Karl Hammar wrote:
--
Firmware/Software
--
The device will run Linux OS.
Audio data transfer will be via netjack using CELT compression.
Ack.
Can CELT also do uncompressed or lossless? Otherwise
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 10:20:45 Adrian Knoth wrote:
Can CELT also do uncompressed or lossless?
That's called raw PCM. ;)
Other things can fit the requirements. (Not saying they make sense but...) I
just figured where CELT was called out that perhaps it could go from
uncompressed or
On Thursday 03 December 2009 18:13:05 Folderol wrote:
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Check my lyrics (poems?) here: http://packet-in.org/repo/user_drewRoberts/
if you have any
On Sunday 24 January 2010 09:46:38 Louigi Verona wrote:
I read about this Korg OASYS. How come, if it is based on Linux, all of its
apps are not even
working on Linux but only compatible with Windows and Mac OS?
Lots of jokers do this. And sometimes they even go backwards.
In another area,
On Sunday 24 January 2010 10:06:35 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:46 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
I read about this Korg OASYS ...
... Proprietary world is so full of wasted efforts, imho.
The 290 employees at KORG is raking in a cool $16,419.7 million in
annual sales
On Monday 25 January 2010 17:59:36 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
he return is
guaranteed be the most random number you could
imagine.
I think you can get this by a simple call to rnd.i()
Now, if you want to make your randomness complex rather than imaginary...
drew
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 03:08:14 Arnold Krille wrote:
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 01:57:05 drew Roberts wrote:
On Monday 25 January 2010 17:59:36 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
he return is
guaranteed be the most random number you could
imagine.
I think you can get
On Monday 12 April 2010 02:07:07 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 00:52 +0100, James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling
On Monday 19 April 2010 02:31:15 Stéphane Letz wrote:
No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not planned as a successor of Jack1.
It was jackdmp *then* jack2 ((-:
This may not be not a misunderstanding of the timeline, rather just a perhaps
an unfamiliar turn of phrase.
Let's say you have Mary Smith
I have been looking for an EDL capable audio player for a while now but have
not found one.
So I hacked together ecaedl.pl which work but is very rough.
More info here:
http://zotzbro.blogspot.com/2010/05/edl-edit-decision-list-audio-player.html
pastebin link here:
On Sunday 30 May 2010 12:41:05 Niels Mayer wrote:
I could certainly create a directory /usr/lib64/lv2/autotalent.lv2 for
the .so file, but what do I use for plugin.ttl and manifest.ttl?
This is where I am hung up at the moment too. Help appreciated.
Thanks!
Niels
http://nielsmayer.com
On Sunday 30 May 2010 12:52:49 drew Roberts wrote:
On Sunday 30 May 2010 12:41:05 Niels Mayer wrote:
I could certainly create a directory /usr/lib64/lv2/autotalent.lv2 for
the .so file, but what do I use for plugin.ttl and manifest.ttl?
This is where I am hung up at the moment too. Help
On Saturday 05 June 2010 14:40:35 Ray Rashif wrote:
The only assurance
is a monetary bounty system.
Might be possible to leave out the monetary bit at least. How about credits on
a musicians next release as a bounty for instance? Other way out bounties?
all the best,
drew
On Sunday 06 June 2010 17:53:44 Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 06/06/2010 10:16 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:12:45PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 06/06/2010 09:43 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Qjackctl has the -n option to select a Jack server name,
and
On Sunday 06 June 2010 18:06:43 Robin Gareus wrote:
Anyway, this is a one-way system. Users will need to use
upstream-trackers to submit information. This somehow undermines the
idea of providing feedback for interop issues at a central location.
Just a central account function would be very
On Monday 07 June 2010 11:12:36 you wrote:
Singing up on each tracker is a one-time only job and much easier than
filing a proper bug report; so that part can actually be neglected.
Actually, I don't think it can be properly neglected. I have bailed on
submitting a bug report more than once at
On Monday 07 June 2010 08:59:09 you wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:18:23 -0400, drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com wrote:
JACK_DEFAULT_SERVER environment variable might be your (only) friend
here :)
snip
Hold on a second. Let me try walking through this.
We start qjackctl. Does it connect
On Monday 07 June 2010 11:03:06 you wrote:
Or it sees a jack running
when
it starts and asks if you want to connect to it or not.
and for what purpose? qjackctl sole function is being attached to a
running jack server. why do you want to make it an option ?
Because perhaps you want it to
On Sunday 13 June 2010 17:35:22 f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
You say these things 'are not there to convey meaning to a human'.
OK. Before it was stated that the software reading them is not
supposed to follow these links and get any information from them.
Speaking from pretty much total
On Friday 18 June 2010 06:13:16 Louigi Verona wrote:
No, I mean hitting Render all song to wav and have everything in one
file.
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
Perhapsjust use jack and hook it up to a simple stereo recorder?
all the best,
drew
On Friday 18 June 2010 08:55:16 Louigi Verona wrote:
And this type of music
requires non-real time work rather than real time. At least when it
concerns final rendering.
But in the case you are speaking of, slower than real time rather than faster
than real time right?
Resulting from too
On Monday 21 June 2010 22:10:23 Paul Davis wrote:
and even if they did this, if their host was the only application that
used the API, the burden of guilt would fall heavily upon them in any
court (legal or public opinion).
Just fund the development of a simple app that used the api and gpl
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 06:38:45 Gene Heskett wrote:
It was the lossless claim that got my attention, Jens. I am well aware
that current compressors can beat that at acceptable quality.
Foe lossless check out:
http://www.wavpack.com/
http://flac.sourceforge.net/
drew
On Friday 16 July 2010 06:06:02 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
It's impossible to do neutral measurements and from a democratically
worldview listening to recordings without dynamic is the winner.
My personal take is that I would prefer different mixes for different uses.
When out walking on dangerous
On Saturday 17 July 2010 17:17:05 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Debouncing and live time of switches always is a gambling game.
Makes me remember key debouncing issues with the TRS-80 Model I keyboards...
drew
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
On Saturday 17 July 2010 22:59:51 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:59:08 pm drew Roberts did opine:
On Saturday 17 July 2010 17:17:05 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Debouncing and live time of switches always is a gambling game.
Makes me remember key debouncing issues with the TRS
On Sunday 18 July 2010 11:14:26 Gene Heskett wrote:
Scary
thought to an old country music fan. ;-)
Who do you like? My dad was a fan and was always playing it around the house
as well as taking us on trips to the opry and what not.
Some of his tastes rubbed off on me.
drew
from one barber to several but they are not big
corporations by any means. The associations may be bigger, but if the members
wanted the software written for them to be Free, they could use their
association to coordinate their efforts.
2010/7/19 drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com:
On Monday 19
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 03:17:56 Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:24:09AM +0200, rom wrote:
I'd like to ask some advice about a small multitrack recorder program i
wrote, and have been using for some time. Basically, what it does is to:
- simultaneously capture sound from
On Thursday 22 July 2010 17:24:24 f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
We all agree on what 'red' means. Because we have learned
the meaning of that word by association. But do we 'see'
the same thing ? AFAIK, that is impossible to verify.
Been asking people the above at least since I was a youngish
On Friday 23 July 2010 07:21:00 Florian Faber wrote:
On 07/23/10 00:06, drew Roberts wrote:
Is some pepper dish twice as hot as another?
If you define 'hot' as 'amount of capsaicine', there is the Scoville scale.
I know of the scale, but does doubling the amount of capsaicin double
the heat
On Thursday 26 August 2010 19:34:04 Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I have issues with jack client names that contain whitespaces.
Example:
$ jack_connect MPlayer [19079]:out_0 system:playback_2
ERROR [19079]:out_0 not a valid port
Any idea how I can make this work? I tried:
$ jack_connect MPlayer
On Sunday 10 October 2010 02:11:16 Geoff Beasley wrote:
On 10/10/2010 03:59 PM, Jeff McClintock wrote:
Off-Topic: IMHO Piracy hurts Linux by providing a competing 'low cost'
alternative to*real* free (FOSS) software.
well put
Except for calling it Piracy of course. the idea is accurate in
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or may
not be at least, I do not know enough to say I guess.)
What if I fork a project
On Saturday 29 January 2011 10:17:36 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:05 +0200, Vytautas Jancauskas wrote:
What if I fork a project because I think it gives me a good
starting point
or base for what I want to do but the direction I intend to
On Saturday 29 January 2011 15:14:32 Raymond Martin wrote:
Just because the licenses don't mention being nice, acting with little
courtesy when it comes to using the code written by others won't hurt.
Otherwise I agree with you.
It won't hurt, but is not required in any way, shape, or
On Saturday 29 January 2011 18:59:32 Jeremy Salwen wrote:
Anyway that is the reason I delete the or any later term in my
copyright notices. Apart from the fact that one can never know whether
gpl4 will give all the rights exclusively to microsoft or google or the
nsa...
I have always
I am working on a rewrite (complete along with a rename) of my old
soundwall application.
I hope for this to be a jack app at some point soon.
I hope to make an initial release this weekend.
I am seeking advice on project hosting sites.
I am also seeking input on version control.
Anyone using
do any of the jack client examples show playing a file from disk?
if so, which?
if not, any links to simple code that does this?
c++ or c?
thanks in advance for any pointers.
drew
--
http://freemusicpush.blogspot.com/
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
drew Roberts wrote:
do any of the jack client examples show playing a file from disk?
if so, which?
if not, any links to simple code that does this?
c++ or c?
sndfile-jackplay:
http://www.mega-nerd.com
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
drew Roberts wrote:
do any of the jack client examples show playing a file from disk?
if so, which?
if not, any links to simple code that does this?
c++ or c?
sndfile-jackplay:
http://www.mega-nerd.com
On Thursday 24 February 2011 12:09:19 David Robillard wrote:
This is, of course, a big problem in terms of our greater mission
to provide software that caters to the needs of precisely nobody while
irritating everybody else.
To resolve this situation, we now have an exciting new Clippy
On Friday 31 August 2012 11:32:35 Adrian Knoth wrote:
Hi!
I was recently helping a small Dutch radio station run by volunteers to
set up their new studio.
It's a modular system with a 16 I/O firewire card:
http://www.d-r.nl/AXUM/AXUM.htm
We managed to support it in FFADO. The
On Friday 31 August 2012 12:08:20 Luis Garrido wrote:
On 08/31/2012 05:44 PM, Nils wrote:
Also if yes: Is there even a pre-packaged license that allows:
There is this one, not sure if it fits your purposes, it can probably be
flavored like most CC licenses:
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:00:42 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
the only time it hurts is when i cannot get hardware support for gear
that i need. but these days, i can get linux drivers for everything from
2 to 128 channels of i/o (more if i'm prepared to gang cards), so what's
the problem?
On Thursday 11 October 2012 07:42:22 John Rigg wrote:
First, thanks Adrian for the RayDay mention, and thanks John for this info.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:01:23PM -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
Let's say I want at least 24 ins.
What do I get? Where can I find a HOWTO on my options?
Here's
Oops, mistakenly replied direct instead of to list. Forwarding.
-- Forwarded message --
From: drew Roberts zotz...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?
To: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
On Sun
On Saturday 16 February 2013 10:59:22 Paul Davis wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Bill Gribble g...@billgribble.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 09:18 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
Great Dictator and Malevolent Guru
Polite Grind band name alert!
actually, its a duo. the problem is,
Ignorant here. Trying to scrounge around and make something work for a demo
purpose.
In python I am trying to build this pipeline:
pipeline_txt = (
'jackaudiosrc ! '
'level name=level interval=10 !'
'jackaudiosink')
pipeline =
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 18:51:34 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On Thu, February 28, 2013 8:14 am, drew Roberts wrote:
Ignorant here. Trying to scrounge around and make something work for a
demo
purpose.
In python I am trying to build this pipeline:
pipeline_txt
On Thursday 31 October 2013 11:12:13 Robin Gareus wrote:
On 10/29/2013 05:26 PM, Charles Z Henry wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Robin Gareus ro...@gareus.org wrote:
The system will be activated on 31/Oct/2013 if not vetoed. The actual
rate-limit may also be adjusted over time to
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a suggestion for open source solutions to enable
streaming AV/midi to multiple ARM mobile devices with a one to many
network configuration?
- Icecast is very good at serving audio but
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 4:45 PM Tim wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2018 03:22 AM, Will Godfrey wrote:
> > Linux Audio Music has been dormant for a very long time, but recently I
> > contacted the the person who hosted and ran it.
>
> I would like to suggest that contributors be strongly encouraged
>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 7:19 AM Will J Godfrey
wrote:
>
> Done with:
> systemctl disable dhcpd.service
>
Do you now have to set static IPs on any interface you want to use?
I use a good amount of Pi boxes and, even when I set a static on either the
eth or wifi interface, I like to have
91 matches
Mail list logo
