On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 06:22:21AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 20:29:49 +0300
Juhana Sadeharju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know how to get overloaded complex number operations to C
without rewriting everything in pure C++ style.
I thought C99 had a complex
hello lad'ers !
just fyi, the LAU list has soared to well over 100 subscribers in a
little more than two weeks.
traffic is steadily increasing, and there are five to ten new
subscribers per day at the moment.
looks like there is a strong demand for such a list.
at the same time, the LAD list is
-Original Message-
From: Juhana Sadeharju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
Anyone know how to get overloaded complex number operations to C
without rewriting everything in pure C++ style. It is possible
just to switch compiler to g++ for those files which uses the complex
number
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
RUben
Greetings:
See the short story on Slashdot, or get the scoop (such as it is) at
the BC2K Web site.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/10/2016257mode=thread
I second that, maybe it could be forked off as a part
of the oggvorbis project, as they have created a
foundation to protect themselves from liabilities.
Apparently heroine virtual was actually getting hit
with some real suit or suits, so it wasn't just a
theoretical threat, I perhaps this is
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no warranty. as a post on slashdot
At 16:58 9/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
I second that, maybe it could be forked off as a part
of the oggvorbis project, as they have created a
foundation to protect themselves from liabilities.
Apparently heroine virtual was actually getting hit
with some real suit or suits, so it wasn't just a
Paul Davis wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no
Sad indeed, and (yet) another reason that the expansion of
``intellectual property'' laws over the past decade or so is so
counterproductive.
Worst is that the RIAA has demonstrated themselves to be such total,
clueless idiots in the matter. In their fear of having a few copies
pirated, they're
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, ljp wrote:
At 16:58 9/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
This goes with the current state of the USA and the suit happy atmosphere
here, and people not taking responsibility for themselves and their actions
anymore.
Personally I think it might have to do with this
Its most likely his employer (pioneer) told him to
stop coding or they'd fire or sue him.
--- D. Stimits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Davis wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some
people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit,
It should help the sales of the new nostarch press
book on bcast. I have a copy of the last released
source, I've got a download spot for those who want a
copy, just email me back. Personally I'm going to
study the code and use it to teach myself c/c++, as
its very optimized and stable. Then I
12 matches
Mail list logo
