On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Sander van Zoest wrote:
I am not sure what to do about it, but I am not surprised and I hope
there is something we can do to fight this and get our rights back.
Go for the criminal prosecution angle. There is a pretty clear case of
price fixing among the distributors and
Hi all,
This is truly sad. This has been one of my favourite
pieces of Linux audio software. I guess their are many
possibilities for this latest development. I think the
fact that Broadcast was always on the edge of the open
source thing ( b2000 that is ), I always thought that
something would
That's why the ogg-vorbis group created a non-profit,
to make themselves into a legal charity entity. Same
thing with the freesoftware foundation, I guess beyond
that we can all move to moscow!
--- Sander van Zoest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Dave Phillips wrote:
See the
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
matthias
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:02:39PM -0700, brian redfern wrote:
It should help the sales of the new nostarch press
book on bcast. I have a copy of the last released
source, I've got a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:31:21PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no warranty. as a post on slashdot
points out, Microsoft could
Hi, i am wondering what the status of evo is? is it still in development?
the sourceforge page has nothing, and the last time anything was touched in
http://www.linuxdj.com/evo/ (which i found from the LAD archive) was about a
year ago... i am wanting a sampler equivalent to the A3k etc, and
We are in hard times right now and it almost at a point where I agree
with the Broadcast 2000 folks that maybe pulling out and avoiding being
taken advantage of until we find a way to fight for our rights is a
sad, but potential way I have to go.
Any ideas?
If artists avoid to get
Brian,
are you planning to maintain the current bcast2000 code, or start
something new? There are a few patches on
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/heroines, some of them contributed
by myself, and I'm working on some other improvements as well. If you
(or others) decide to maintain the
bodhi wrote:
Hi, i am wondering what the status of evo is? is it still in development?
the sourceforge page has nothing, and the last time anything was touched in
http://www.linuxdj.com/evo/ (which i found from the LAD archive) was about a
year ago... i am wanting a sampler equivalent to
Matthias Weiss wrote:
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
matthias
Appears to be gone from there!
--
Wendell Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anncrman.com
Show me the country in which there are no strikes and I'll
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:42:10PM +0200, Nicolas Noble wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Matthias Weiss wrote:
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
Wrong... What's still downloadable are the 'around' librairies and
tools. The
Is anyone planning on picking this up? I'd do it myself if I had a)
time and b) better coding skills. BC2K is/was a fine piece of work.
Ruben Merz wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
RUben
Greetings:
See the short
If artists avoid to get contracts with this media industry, this industry will
eventually be useless. We made them as powerful as they are today, only
we can take away their power again.
If artists and consumers are happy (as it seems today) I see no way out
except for some niches.
From: Tommi Ilmonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a small low-level high-performance DSP library (C++) that is
distributed with Mustajuuri. I am intentionally keeping it small and very
stand-alone. Right now there are only a few filter classes and delay
lines. I have a few compression and limiter
What is required to support VST plugins on Linux/x86 is twofold:
1) a way of executing a dynamically linked object that was
built for Windows/x86.
2) a library that implements the libvstgui API
Couldn't you apply (1) to execute the Windows DLL version of libvstgui
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
I still would like to suggest to make clear difference between
the actual code and the plug-in wrapping. It would be quite simple
to have compressor/limiter functions which are then used in various
plug-in wrappings.
I don't know what
Wouldn't having to run plugins with Wine totally kill any hope for
low-latency, except on maybe a dual 1.2-Ghz box?
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Paul Davis wrote:
What is required to support VST plugins on Linux/x86 is twofold:
1) a way of executing a dynamically linked object that was
Wouldn't having to run plugins with Wine totally kill any hope for
low-latency, except on maybe a dual 1.2-Ghz box?
probably, except that my point was really that running under Wine
isn't actually viable anyway. besides, its not really running under
Wine. it would something more like using part
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:20:33 +0200
Jörn Nettingsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodhi wrote:
Hi, i am wondering what the status of evo is? is it
still in development?
the sourceforge page has nothing, and the last time
anything was touched in
http://www.linuxdj.com/evo/ (which i
19 matches
Mail list logo
