Video JACK?, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] What about OpenML? Some questions

2001-10-16 Thread Jelle
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 06:57:27PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: If and how could it be fit into LADSPA or JACK? Or should OpenML be the graph-host and host LADSPA plugins (so you may get hardware benefits)? LADSPA and JACK are completely orthogonal to one another. LADSPA can exist without

Re: [linux-audio-dev] surround encoding

2001-10-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 11:36:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: whats the legal status of surround encoding? are we free to write GPL'ed software that encodes 6 streams of audio data into DTS or Dolby digital? Nope, the dolby ones at least are very much not free. c.f. www.dolby.com I've written

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsaplayer-devel]Latest cvs

2001-10-16 Thread Patrick Shirkey
The mad plugin is working here although I have a vague feeling that the pitch is slightly high. The tempo feels right though. It could be that the old plugin has corrupted my sense of pitch though. The seeking performs much better although it will take some practice to get a good digital scratch

Re: [linux-audio-dev] surround encoding

2001-10-16 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
From: Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] DTS OTOH is patented, but I've a feeling the the line format is just the 2 stereo channels plus Sr, Sl and LFE, uncompressed on the data channels, so its hard to imagine that thats covered by the patents. Maybe they could give a permission for free encoder

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsaplayer-devel]Latest cvs

2001-10-16 Thread dave willis
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: The mad plugin is working here although I have a vague feeling that the pitch is slightly high. .. You should post to LAD and LAU. No, don't worry I will. what the hell are you talking about? don't just cc your reply from another list to here

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Broadcast 2000 removed from public access

2001-10-16 Thread Son of Zev
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:51, Fred Gleason wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Son of Zev wrote: At this stage I am unaware of any precedent to this kind of claim. The claim against mp3/p2p software was an issue of music copyright and the illegal distribution of it - however no one ever sued anyone

Re: [linux-audio-dev] surround encoding

2001-10-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 04:46:33PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: From:Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] DTS OTOH is patented, but I've a feeling the the line format is just the 2 stereo channels plus Sr, Sl and LFE, uncompressed on the data channels, so its hard to imagine that thats

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsaplayer-devel]Latest cvs

2001-10-16 Thread Patrick Shirkey
what the hell are you talking about? don't just cc your reply from another list to here (or anywhere else) if it's not clear to people who've been following the thread - write a new detailed post instead. Sorry for being inconcise. What I thought was clear from that post is that I am very

Re: [linux-audio-dev] surround encoding

2001-10-16 Thread Dan Hollis
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Steve Harris wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 04:46:33PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: In extreme, people would have to design a new free surround format and offer the decoder to amplifier manufacturers. What about ambisonics? I think the decoder hardware is expensive

[linux-audio-dev] let's attack slashdot! :)

2001-10-16 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On slashdot.org frontpage: Recently a friend of mine who is chief engineer at a medium size recording studio/radio station has become increasingly unhappy with Windows (and would like to stay away from Macs) and has asked me if there is any sort of professional audio solution for Linux. Has

[linux-audio-dev] Slashdot story on Linux Audio

2001-10-16 Thread Torrey Hoffman
Hey there. I'm a one-month interested reader of this list and Slashdot reader (*). I know that many people here could contribute helpful and informative comments to the current Slashdot article about pro audio under Linux. If you've got a few minutes to provide enlightenment, heaven knows it's

Re: Video JACK?, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] What about OpenML? Some questions

2001-10-16 Thread Jelle
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:09:46AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: I was suggesting that maybe OpenML could provide some processing advantages if it was integrated in a LADSPA host, by for example, letting all the mixing and equalizing be done by hardware... (ignoring OpenML's lack of callback model

[linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Steve Harris
Anyone know anything about kLADSPA? Its linked off SuSE's music apps page and theres a screenshot (http://www.suse.de/de/products/suse_linux/i386/images/kladspa.png), but a search on google doesn't show up anything else. Looks really useful. - Steve

[linux-audio-dev] good news regarding Hammerfall DSP linux drivers

2001-10-16 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Hi all, Here's what I got today from RME, after telling them just how much we, the linux community, needed the specs, in order to get the drivers going :-). Enjoy! Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer sound designer http://ping.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/ -Original Message-

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Paul Davis
Anyone know anything about kLADSPA? Its linked off SuSE's music apps page and theres a screenshot (http://www.suse.de/de/products/suse_linux/i386/images/kladspa.png), but a search on google doesn't show up anything else. Looks really useful. it sure does, despite having a name that starts with

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Steve Harris wrote: Anyone know anything about kLADSPA? Its linked off SuSE's music apps page and theres a screenshot (http://www.suse.de/de/products/suse_linux/i386/images/kladspa.png), but a search on google doesn't show up anything else. [...] Looks really useful.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 03:46:48PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: i also like the tabbed folder idea for plugins. i think i should modify ardour's handling for Route plugins to do the same thing. uh. wait a second. one of the biggest complaints about ProTools at some point in the recent past was

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread David O'Toole
at some point in the recent past was that you could only run a single plugin editor at one time ... thinks This might be contraversial, and/or terrible gui design, but how about dockable tabs? you can drag the tab away to make a seperate window, or drag the window into the tab bar

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Steve Harris wrote: ... kladspa has MIDI and sliders for controls, while ecamegapedal has a vu-meter and support for multi-plugin presets. Unfortunatly its the sliders that I'm after though. As we all know, the unwritten rule of the linux-audio-dev world is that if your

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] let's attack slashdot! :)

2001-10-16 Thread Chuck Busby
Your friend should check out http://www.kpig.com/ This is a radio station out of Freedom California, near Santa Cruz. All of their software is open source. Chuck Busby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kai Vehmanen wrote: On slashdot.org frontpage: Recently a friend of mine who is chief engineer at a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, David O'Toole wrote: This might be contraversial, and/or terrible gui design, but how about dockable tabs? you can drag the tab away to make a seperate window, or drag the window into the tab bar of another. I've been trying that out:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kladspa?

2001-10-16 Thread Paul Davis
As we all know, the unwritten rule of the linux-audio-dev world is that if your feature request is not implemented in 60 minutes, you will get one extra feature for free! LOL! pin this on my wall! --p