On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:02:51 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
603k! ah well i needed a fresh set anyway,
you changed the plate since .2.8, right?
Yes, though it could still do with some work. I'm not sure what exactly,
I've never played with a real plate. Its a physical model, and they can
be
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:24:48 -0700, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:45:27AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
No, it will not be bandlimited. I'l have to think about how to do this.
Maybe just by using an oversampled Chebyshev(sp?) and increasing harmonic
level with the
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
ah, now i dig it. maybe you could make a note about the intended
use in the valve doc?
Yeah, I should probably do that. Documentation (well english in general!)
is not my strong point.
good. do you think the 44100/12 oscillation is a
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
Steve Harris wrote:
Stacking the valve plugins is the key to making them sound interesting.
ah, now i dig it. maybe you could make a note about the intended
use in the valve doc?
Er, one more. There is also the valve rectifier
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 08:41, Steve Harris wrote:
Its not that suprising, it seems to be one of the
things that gives 303's there distinctive bite, and might play well with
further waveshaping stages.
Talking of 303s, how come Freebirth had to be pulled? I heard
propellerheads threatened them
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:12, Tim Goetze wrote:
Lea Anthony wrote:
Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds rock!
haven't heard it yet, no.
if you happen to use it, it'd be very interesting to hear
how much cpu load the different sub-modules generate.
It's a windows app so I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:02:02 +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Talking of 303s, how come Freebirth had to be pulled? I heard
propellerheads threatened them as they had copied their layout. Which
begs the question, why isn't Roland suing P/heads for copying the layout
of the 303/808/909
I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:05:49 +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Also, I must ask this, how much of the LAD stuff is designed with 32bit
audio in mind? I ask because that's what I work in, then dither down to
16bit when mastering.
My code it is all at least 32bit internally (much is 64bit) and all
That's great news! For some reason I was thinking that most LAD stuff
works in 44.1/16 which really isn't the best for professional audio. I
only dither down when mastering to a CD.
Hmm.. ok. Does anyone go up to 96Khz sampling?
Just trying to get a feel what people see as acceptable etc.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:02:02 +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Talking of 303s, how come Freebirth had to be pulled? I heard
And it wasn't Freebirth (which is still going AFAIK) it was reborn.
- Steve
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:52:06 +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Hmm.. ok. Does anyone go up to 96Khz sampling?
A few people do, yes. It eats through ADAT and TDIF channels very quicly
though.
PS: I never use 96Khz but I'm sure there are plenty who would want to
use LAD technology for DVD
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:01:03 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds rock!
seconded. i've heard amplitube and its amazing. if you have it, you
can toss out every cabinet you've ever used except your favorite, just
Hehe, thats what people said about bass
On 24 Oct 2002, Lea Anthony wrote:
That SUCKS big time. They want to use someone elses layout but then get
pissy when someone uses theirs.
Time to write an email :(
Umm. You really should read the archives on this topic first. The
discussion got rather out of hand and I'm pretty sure
Sure. Where are they?
-Lea.
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 12:00, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
Umm. You really should read the archives on this topic first. The
discussion got rather out of hand and I'm pretty sure all the bases were
covered.
Lea Anthony wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:12, Tim Goetze wrote:
Lea Anthony wrote:
Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds rock!
haven't heard it yet, no.
if you happen to use it, it'd be very interesting to hear
how much cpu load the different sub-modules generate.
It's a
Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
ah, now i dig it. maybe you could make a note about the intended
use in the valve doc?
Yeah, I should probably do that. Documentation (well english in general!)
is not my strong point.
yeah, i guess we'd all be
Hi,
on the other hand we got buzz working (www.buzzmachines.com).
Stefan
Mark Knecht wrote:
Taybin,
So I may one day be able to run Acid Pro in wine and route audio to
alsa?
That would be just too cool for words! ;-)
Mark
Don't get your hopes up. I can't even get Sibelius to run in wine
me wrote:
Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:02:51 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
603k! ah well i needed a fresh set anyway,
you changed the plate since .2.8, right?
Yes, though it could still do with some work. I'm not sure what exactly,
I've never played with a real plate. Its a
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:27:04 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
i like the .2.8 version as it stands (though iirc you said
it didn't do what you intended it to).
I dont think it sounds quite right, but maybe im expecting it to be more
like a synthetic plate reverb, than an actual metal plate.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:19:20 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
I'm 90% sure its from the crossover between the two halves of the class B
amp (thats the power amp IIRC).
drat. i wish i was better at understanding electronics.
the amp guy pointed in this direction too.
Did he give the impression
my feeling is that oversampling alone will not do, although
you're probably right in that it will get rid of most of
the aliasing.
Its how most people tackle to problem. I think I can get the valve cheap
enough that it will be practical.
I'm not really familiar with what are the techniques
Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:19:20 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
I'm 90% sure its from the crossover between the two halves of the class B
amp (thats the power amp IIRC).
drat. i wish i was better at understanding electronics.
the amp guy pointed in this direction too.
Did he
nikodimka wrote:
You can calculate your tranformation for the input signal S(x_i) once
And the same transformation for S(x_i)+1 again.
I mean two similar input signals differing in one bit of value.
So when you have two output saignals you can calculate
the error due to aliasing: abs( F(S(x_i))
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:27:59 -0700, nikodimka wrote:
You can calculate your tranformation for the input signal S(x_i) once
And the same transformation for S(x_i)+1 again.
Won't that just give you the gradient at point x_i, ie. d/dt(S)?
We are talking about frequency domain aliasing here,
David,
Actually, if I wanted to get my hopes up, I would have asked for Pro
Tools running under wine. Now that would be quite an accomplishment...
Being that I'm just a user type, I actually don't understand why this
sort of thing doesn't actually work. PTLE has it's own hardware. No one
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:49:12 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
I doubt that the electronics ever produces hard square clips.
don't the scope traces suggest they do? i'll try and record
the circuit output from the fender, it has line-out and fx
send.
They dont look very square to me, there is
While I don't disagree with anything you say, I think you miss the point.
People come into the studio with PT sessions from other places. They want to
be able to continue to run them. Even if the hardware isn't that good (and
PTLE hardware isn't, but it isn't that bad either) it's good enough
I'm really late on this one, but I finally looked at the linked
waveforms. Here is what I see.
Ignoring push-pull crossover distortion, there are basically two kinds
of distortion happening. There are two stages to the amplification, a
pre-amp and an output amp. The pre-amp provides soft
Len wrote:
If you will be making money from a Linux-based product, then you
*should* be investing your own money for promotion.
I am. What's your point?
Other people (people who are not in business) need not and likely won't
invest money to promote Linux Audio.
People here invest their time
On 24 Oct 2002, Lea Anthony wrote:
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are seen as
potentially really good under Linux?
snd, http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/CCRMA/Software/snd/snd.html (superior)
sweep,
also, I didn't realize that the Company Name is necessary
to get the web URL to show up.
Fixed :)
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
For the discerning hardware connoisseur
Http://www.boosthardware.com
Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:31:04PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:23:32 -0700, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:41:36AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Looking at the scope traces from that guys site (which I will read later
today), there is some fairly
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2002 17:42, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
I can't answer this properly, but there is some issue to with mmap mode I
believe. It is a very small number of cards that dont
Paul,
While I don't disagree with anything you say, I think you miss the point.
People come into the studio with PT sessions from other places. They want to
be able to continue to run them. Even if the hardware isn't that good (and
PTLE hardware isn't, but it isn't that bad either) it's good
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:32:22 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
I suspect this dip is some kind of reflection from the limit, but I can't
tell without trying one.
you mean you intend to change valve to have adjustable
slope where it compresses? sounds good, if that is what
you mean.
Nope, that
You can calculate your tranformation for the input signal S(x_i) once
And the same transformation for S(x_i)+1 again.
Won't that just give you the gradient at point x_i, ie. d/dt(S)?
yes.
We are talking about frequency domain aliasing here,
oh yeah i see. sorry.
which is when you
generate
Actually, if I wanted to get my hopes up, I would have asked for Pro
Tools running under wine. Now that would be quite an accomplishment...
Being that I'm just a user type, I actually don't understand why this
sort of thing doesn't actually work.
because the windows API that ProTools is
On 19 Oct 2002, Lea Anthony wrote:
Hi,
I am a musician and also a programmer. I have many years experience of
coding but not in the audio field. Any tuts around? How do I get into
it?
You can start by helping me finish the linux-port of my Radium music
editor,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:49:40PM +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Does it have a built in Wave editor?
No.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Welcome to Muppet Labs, where the future is made - today!
Does it have a built in Wave editor? I can't see anything in the
features list or FAQ.
-Lea.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:23:32 -0700, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:41:36AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Looking at the scope traces from that guys site (which I will read later
today), there is some fairly serious HP filtering going on sometime after
one of the amp stages.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:41:36AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Looking at the scope traces from that guys site (which I will read later
today), there is some fairly serious HP filtering going on sometime after
one of the amp stages.
Output transformer? Certainly they don't have infinite
Well, there is the ProTools/FREE version
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardware in the system.
(At least using the default Windows installer from DigiDesign.) If you're
talking about some other method of installing, then I think
Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardware in the system.
(At least using the default Windows installer from DigiDesign.) If you're
talking about some other method of installing, then I think you're just
pulling my leg back. ;-)
no, i meant that you don't need PT at all to run a
On Thursday 24 Oct 2002 18:32, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
[snip]
I don't want to have to learn about DSPs and stuff to be able to identify
a _good_ sound card. I've currently got a shortlist for my next machine:
* MidiMan Delta Audiophile 2496
Reiner wrote:
- there's patch for PD that provides JACK-support
-
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1169519
Actually, this is no longer current. Check the pd list archive for
newer approaches to pd jackification. Personally, I now use Günther
Geiger's patch applied to pd
I just spent several hours last night comparing three different editors.
Basically, all of them have something to recommend, and
I plan on keeping all of them on my system. The skinny:
Snd: My old favorite. Easy to use, keeps getting better, but a bit
ugly still. Nonetheless, I know how to
Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly , but to install PTLE you must have PTLE hardware in the system.
Not true. I have ProTools Free installed on a Windows box with no digi h/w
whatsoever. PT Free can import files from other versions of PT.
-dgm
(At least using the default Windows installer from
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button in the bottom left corner of
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button
Well, I don't know why I haven't announced it here yet, but... I'm the
author of ReZound
http://rezound.sourceforge.net
check it out...
-- Davy
Lea Anthony wrote:
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are
51 matches
Mail list logo
