Hi,
I was wondering, is it possible to assign /dev/dspX devices to the
secondary and tertiary PCM devices on an emu10k1?
I have a SB Live! Platinum with LiveDrive IR. The stereo out is connected
to my regular set of speakers. The surround output is connected to an
earphone headset, it's mic is
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 22:14, John Check wrote:
On Saturday 27 November 2004 07:43 am, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 11:06, MarC wrote:
what about creating a wiki website to submit soundcard experiences?
This also seems like a good idea to me, and it would be cool to have a
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 21:43, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 01:51 +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
They create software to support it and make it work. Then all the
technical information goes into the public domain and some low cost
manufacturer from Taiwan or Russia or somewhere
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 23:21, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to say this. Personally,
open source is not a religion for me so a closed source driver would be
fine and dandy. Let the flames commence - now
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 22:36, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Did this happen?
Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
long and colorful history of pro audio
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:24:28 +0100
Melanie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, is it possible to assign /dev/dspX devices to the
secondary and tertiary PCM devices on an emu10k1?
[snip]
Is it possible, maybe with module parameters, to make alsa do this? Would
it need a patch,
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:36:10 -0500
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyhoo, I had a spark of inspiration and banged out a little sort of folk tune
tracked with ardour. Audacity as a front end for LAME. Still getting my ears
calibrated to a subpar monitoring system so forgive the buried vox
Hey John:
I'll chime in with some kudos for the tune, but I agree with your own
assessment re: the vocal, it does need to come forward. No point in
singing words if they can't be heard or understood, yes ?
Vocals are often a problem for people who don't particularly think of
themselves as
Hi,
AFAIK:
OSS device on emu10k1 is always routed to front channels.
Routing can be changed through alsa mixer api (there are controls
controling channel routing), but this is not simple and there is
problem to know what oss stream uses what hw stream, because these are
alocated dynamicallly.
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Did this happen?
Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
long and colorful history of pro audio hardware
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 13:35, R Parker wrote:
--- Marek Peteraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 23:21, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner
wrote:
Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to
say this. Personally,
open source
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:03, tim hall wrote:
Last Saturday 27 November 2004 21:36, Lee Revell was like:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Did this happen?
Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
Just to save people some googling here is a thread that
[Marek Peteraj]
RME has provided
Pro grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
in order to become a legitimate alternative to
proprietary solutions.
Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember the
name) who did. Remember it was almost no investment from RME's side.
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Marek Peteraj]
RME has provided
Pro grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
in order to become a legitimate alternative to
proprietary solutions.
Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember the
name) who
On Sunday 28 November 2004 07:52 am, Dave Phillips wrote:
Hey John:
I'll chime in with some kudos for the tune, but I agree with your own
Thanks
assessment re: the vocal, it does need to come forward. No point in
singing words if they can't be heard or understood, yes ?
Vocals are
Hi,
Peter Zubaj wrote:
Other ways will require driver change.
Any pointers to where (file, ~line) this is allocated/assigned. Where I
would need to change this?
Melanie
HI,
Florian Schmidt wrote:
http://alsa-project.org/~iwai/OSS-Emulation.html
Read up on the device mapping section.
I already found that. It's not what I need, it doesn't allow to re-route
the OSS devices. The secondary PCM on emu10k1 is not represented as the 2nd
channel by the driver.
Along with Common C++, I also made available the first release of the
new and much improved stand-alone (no longer requires GNU Common C++)
version of the GNU Common C++ Audio class framework; ccaudio2. This
new framework, in addition to being more portable and fully endian aware
than it's
Hallo,
Jan Depner hat gesagt: // Jan Depner wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:36, Lee Revell wrote:
IMO the issue is not whether RME's concern is valid - clearly it is.
Sorry, but arguing otherwise makes us look stupid and naive. The issue
is how to address this concern. If that means a
Why? Because with the availability of closed drivers the (market)
demand for open source drivers suddenly becomes as small as the
handful of Libre Software supporters like I am one. The just make my
hardware work type of Linux users is not interested in Open Source
drivers anymore, so why
I'm proud to announce a new stable release of Hydrogen Drum Machine!!
Features:
__General__
* Very user-friendly, modular, fast and intuitive graphical interface based
on QT 3.
* Sample-based stereo audio engine, with import of sound samples in .wav, .au
and .aiff formats.
* Support of
Marek Peteraj wrote:
Oh BTW, just in case :)
http://www.petitiononline.com/atipet/petition.html
Free as in Nelson Mandela :)
~ Simon
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 06:52, Dave Phillips wrote:
Hey John:
I'll chime in with some kudos for the tune, but I agree with your own
assessment re: the vocal, it does need to come forward. No point in
singing words if they can't be heard or understood, yes ?
Vocals are often a problem
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Marek Peteraj]
RME has provided
Pro grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
in order to become a legitimate alternative to
proprietary solutions.
Not really. It was Paul,
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 19:53, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Marek Peteraj]
RME has provided
Pro grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
in order to become a legitimate alternative to
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 18:12 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
And who the heck cares, that you
cannot buy a single modern 3D-card anymore, which has open source
drivers, by any manufacturer?
Sure you can. The VIA unichrome cards have open 3D drivers. But, of
course, it's not the best 3D hardware
Marcus Andersson wrote:
Hi,
what you need to figure out is how hardware can be developed by people
living in different countries, the same way email/sourceforge/CVS
pretty much solved the distribution problem for software. Here is just
a couple of ideas.
All interested developers buy a
Ah i don't know. I mean, you guys have put a lot of time into what your
doing anyway. And in my case the trust in rme turned out to be a bummer
just becasue i was thinking that they have trust in the open source
developers. If they did have such trust, something like this would
On Sunday 28 November 2004 01:40 pm, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 06:52, Dave Phillips wrote:
Hey John:
I'll chime in with some kudos for the tune, but I agree with your own
assessment re: the vocal, it does need to come forward. No point in
singing words if they can't be
Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
Nvidia has a lot more valuable IP at stake than VIA when they
release an open source driver for their 3D gear. If you don't
understand why, I can't help you.
I do understand this very well. Because this is the central conflict:
I will not
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:27:46AM +1300, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
So, what is the difference between our current offerings and what you'd like
to see in a pro audio card?
I don't see any gross difference except the input/output connectors.
Bundle the 5042 or 5044 with adapters or breakout
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 22:09 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
Nvidia has a lot more valuable IP at stake than VIA when they
release an open source driver for their 3D gear. If you don't
understand why, I can't help you.
I do understand
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 21:31, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:20:33 -0500, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 12:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Fine with me. If I shelled out for RME hardware I better be able to
call RME for support, same as on any
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 10:27, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
Ah i don't know. I mean, you guys have put a lot of time into what your
doing anyway. And in my case the trust in rme turned out to be a bummer
just becasue i was thinking that they have trust in the open source
developers.
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 00:58, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:25:09 +0100, Marek Peteraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 21:31, Mark Knecht wrote:
One nice example. Korg 1212 i/o, worked under win98, doesn't under winXP
because korg does not provide support for
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 01:32, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:19:14 +0100, Marek Peteraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RME never 'supported' the card under Linux. The 'supported' the
developers by providing technical info. I did not purchase the card
because of RME telling
36 matches
Mail list logo
