Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 02:10 +, Lachlan Davison wrote: So i think the goal really needs to be as Jay said, it just works. Agree 100%, but we need to be fully aware that this we are tackling a problem that no one has ever solved. OSX just works because Apple controls the hardware and has full

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread David Cournapeau
Lee Revell wrote: On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 02:10 +, Lachlan Davison wrote: So i think the goal really needs to be as Jay said, it just works. Agree 100%, but we need to be fully aware that this we are tackling a problem that no one has ever solved. OSX just works because Apple

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread gerard van dongen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:57:27 +0200, fons adriaensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A number of issues have been mixed up in this debate: 1. 'cheap' vs. 'pro' audio cards. I do agree there is a large category in between, usually named 'prosumer', and that these are used by 'professional' (as

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: multi-client hell

2005-06-19 Thread David Cournapeau
Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 20:51 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: its already a nightmare beacuse gstreamer wants to use OSS emulation on the same channel as mplayer32 (which i could get around by running a second jackd in 32bit mode, connecting to mplayer32 and communicating

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Jay Vaughan
And since when is switching the audio engine to change from reading your email to doing your audio editing a big issue? i'll tell you when: when you've used OSX, and are now trying Linux out, and Don't Understand At All Why You Have To Even Bother, Or Why Its Cool That You Have To Bother.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Jay Vaughan
- If ever I have reason, as a customer paying for your services, to suspect that you are careless about the security and confidentiality of the data related to my project, for example if I know that your girlfriend or 12 year old son are using the same login to do their chatting, then I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Now given the two following options: A. Extend Jack to accomodate all the diverse needs of the desktop developers, and request them to use it for all applications, this woud IMHO be the best solution, but it will not happen or at least last very long until * all distros will have JACK

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Peter Zubaj
this woud IMHO be the best solution, but it will not happen or at least last very long until * all distros will have JACK running per default * all developers of any audio program have rewritten their code. Why not use only ALSA API. There is alsa to jack plugin. If someone wants use jack it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Benno Senoner
Lee Revell wrote: FWIW, Linspire (formerly Lindows) have made the same conclusion, and their next release will use JACK for all desktop audio. Interesting. Do you know how they intend to use jack for desktop apps ? using artsd/gstreamer/esd piped into jack or other methods ? Benno

[linux-audio-dev] Audigy 2 ZS Notebook drivers

2005-06-19 Thread Melanie
Hi, i have searched the web and the ALSA pages and found very little information concerning the status of the development efforts, if any, and who might be interested. This card seems like a good means to hook a notebook into a DJ mixer, splitting the output into 2 or 3 stereo outs. I am

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Interesting. Do you know how they intend to use jack for desktop apps ? using artsd/gstreamer/esd piped into jack or other methods ? I guess via bio2jack.sf.net. THe xmms output plugin is based on it, and I guess also the arts output plugin does use it. Best regards ce

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Why not use only ALSA API. There is alsa to jack plugin. If someone wants use jack it can be used to route audio to jack. Also there are alsa - OSS driver plugins. This means you can output sound from alsa app to oss driver or capture from alsa driver without any source change. As soon as

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Richard Spindler
Hm, maybe the following will be an acceptable solution: Non-Pro Applications should use the ALSA-API for Audio Output and Input. They will use the default ALSA Device, which by default should be the DMIX Plugin, which does samplerate conversion and mixing, if this is not provided by the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Dave Phillips
Jay Vaughan wrote: look, the point is: your proposal is faulty. having two logins, one for 'pro' use, and one for 'my teenage daughter', instead of engineering software subsystems that can accomodate the need for professional, always-working, rock-solid stable audio .. this is just ..

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Dave Phillips
Lachlan Davison wrote: Just to join in... from a dance music making perspective i'm not sure if i understand this customer concept. Does your fav rock band use best practice and professional conduct? are they not professional? I hope at least some of the people on here are interested in making

[linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: The subject says it all. My own Linux audio sucks hobbyhorse: No way to recall a complex configuration of apps and plugins with all settings intact. If I use a complicated setup with multiple synths and plugins I have no way to recall these applications to their previous

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Jay Vaughan
I lied about retiring from this discussion. ;-) well .. good, because i believe this thread bears fruit. I agree that the distinction between pro and consumer should be a non-issue. Historically hardware manufacturers certainly make the distinction, they build some gear for Johnny Stay At

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Jay Vaughan
And your favorite is... ? The ALSA versus OSS war. This blows. ALSA compatability layer in OSS, OSS compatability layer in ALSA ... The fact is, the OSS guys profit from perpetuating this problem. I would never buy a driver from them, because they have a vested interest in keeping

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:44 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote: Lee Revell wrote: FWIW, Linspire (formerly Lindows) have made the same conclusion, and their next release will use JACK for all desktop audio. Interesting. Do you know how they intend to use jack for desktop apps ? using

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audigy 2 ZS Notebook drivers

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 13:42 +0200, Melanie wrote: Hi, i have searched the web and the ALSA pages and found very little information concerning the status of the development efforts, if any, and who might be interested. This card seems like a good means to hook a notebook into a DJ

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
The subject says it all. Are you serious?!? This can cause a further thread which will be called flamewar. And your favorite is... ? I guess I'd better shut up :) . Best regards ce

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:01 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: And your favorite is... ? Skype and other closed source apps which refuse to support ALSA properly, leading to tons of useless bug reports and users blaming the problem on ALSA. Lee

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:02 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:01 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: And your favorite is... ? Skype and other closed source apps which refuse to support ALSA properly, leading to tons of useless bug reports and users blaming the problem on

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:42 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: MULTIPLE SOUNDS: looks like dmix solves the problem but it seems like it's not that easy to set it up (I haven't tried since I have soundcard with hw support for multiple channels). Fixed in ALSA 1.0.9. SOUNBLASTER LIVE

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
OK, And your favorite is... ? you asked for it :) . Some things which I'd really appreciate: * Applications could remember tha last used MIDI and JACK connections as well as the last used file and resetup itselves when getting restarted. Applications could write these infos to the config

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: multi-client hell

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
I've long wanted to add samplerate conversion to jack, but haven't made my mind on how it should be implemented. AFAIK JACK isn't intended to do samplerate conversion on the fly. To do this, you need something on top of JACK (maybe a soundserver) or between JACK and the actual hardware

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
We are trying to provide an OSX like experience but support the range of hardware that Windows does. Microsoft has more dollars at its disposal than any entity in history, and they have not solved this problem yet. yeah, but perhaps it wasn't important enough for them to spent money working

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio SimplyWork Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El sb, 18-06-2005 a las 18:34, Lee Revell escribi: On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 16:38 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote: Well I think that there is absolutly no border between Professional Audio and Non-Professional Audio. Just think about it, today you're using mainly xmms to play some

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Hi, personally, if i knew it would help, i wouldn't mind spending time patching existing apps and submitting patches to their coders, if it brought everyone into a 'common base' that could be further exploited to put linux audio in a better state. much appreciated. You're welcome :) . But

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Hm, maybe the following will be an acceptable solution: Non-Pro Applications should use the ALSA-API for Audio Output and Input. They will use the default ALSA Device, which by default should be the DMIX Plugin, which does samplerate conversion and mixing, if this is not provided by the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 23:31 +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote: Forget it. The distros put packages together (that's their first job) and create installers and configuration GUIs. They do not help improving packages. But the core ALSA developers work for SuSE. There must be some other

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio SimplyWork Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
* Want audio on GNU/Linux? Use ALSA + jack _directly_. This means that some audio applications will suddenly be unable to output sound, and still work is needed to prepare JACK for this special task. I think that the approach of using DMIX between the ALSA driver and JACK can be a pragmatic

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio SimplyWork Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
The Linspire guy confirmed that their next version will do this. AFAIK it's not available yet. OK, but I don't think they have jackified all apps (and even if so, give the code because most apps are GPL'ed ;-). Most probably they have used bio2jack a lot, but if this hack helps, there's

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great?

2005-06-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
But the core ALSA developers work for SuSE. There must be some other explanation for this one. Maybe they just felt that dmix was not ready until recently. Or maybe their desktop people really do not ever talk to the ALSA people. Takashi once told me that DMIX was a bit buggy for some

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
Dave Phillips wrote: Greetings: The subject says it all. My own Linux audio sucks hobbyhorse: No way to recall a complex configuration of apps and plugins with all settings intact. If I use a complicated setup with multiple synths and plugins I have no way to recall these applications

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ? - ALSA

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
ALSA related, I hate: -Dmix. It's not fair, why not the windows/beos approach which uses primary/secondary buffers? so you can AT THE SAME TIME access asyncronously to the audio device (Jack) and have lower priority audio mix when it can, by copying it from from some less-priority buffers

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread ix
As I said many times It's not that I hate Linux Audio, but mainly that I mmh, i love it, believe that it is too poor in features/API for my taste. I tried very hard for several years to make my apps play together with jack/alsa, but I find myself very limited in many areas as a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 22:22 -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote: -Alsa/Jack integration in timestamping is poor, syncronizing audio to midi is a pain -I have no way to ask from a sequencer, the patch names available in a softsynth to list them -Jack lack of midi Many people have made the same

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

2005-06-19 Thread Juan Linietsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I said many times It's not that I hate Linux Audio, but mainly that I mmh, i love it, believe that it is too poor in features/API for my taste. I tried very hard for several years to make my apps play together with jack/alsa, but I find myself very