On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:21 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On 3/14/07, Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 08:56 -0400, Paul Coccoli wrote:
Besides, what you want is probably impossible. You can't have
pre-comiled, binary-only drivers *and* a custom kernel.
in
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 15:43 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
2. We build binaries for the lowest common denominator, so the plugins
you'll find in Fedora, for instance, don't take advantage of SSE
hardware or instruction scheduling for different processors. This can
make a huge difference. What
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:46 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
On 12/4/06, Brad Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe everyone would join in and raise their glass to you Dave, for
your contributions to Linux Audio! Thank You.
++thanks;
(incf thanks)
Thanks Dave, your musings will be sorely
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 12:46 +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
Josef Jurek wrote:
Marketing propaganda? 4Front Technologies is a company that
engages in the sale of software for profit. 4Front Technologies therefore
requires and presumably has a market, people who pay them for their
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 15:51 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 20:33 +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 23:53 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Dave Robillard wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 17:43 +0200, Luis Garrido wrote:
LinuxSampler is not free software or open
Hey, I thought this might be of interest...
For some reason the blurb is, right now, incomplete in the url below
(will be fixed asap), so I'm including the whole thing here.
-- Fernando
The Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics would like to
announce a job opening for
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
Raymond Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I remember there's a kernel pcmcia bug preventing the development for
the Audigy2 pcmcia notebook sound card driver.
See
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:27, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:31 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:49:11 -0400
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, it's not an issue for apps driven by hardware interrupts like
JACK, because the sound
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 15:17, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:20:20PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 13:52 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 13:42 -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
What is driving the kernel-devs to regress on this
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 16:06, fons adriaensen wrote:
[ Fernando Lopez-Lezcano ]
So, worst case scheduling would seem to me to be around 0.32 msec (ie: I
want the message to be sent at time t+/-320 usec).
If you want jitter-free MIDI clock, that is absolutely correct. OTOH,
I often
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 09:02, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 13:42 +0200, Melanie wrote:
Hi,
i have searched the web and the ALSA pages and found very little
information concerning the status of the development efforts, if
any, and who might be interested.
This card
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:52, Maarten De Boer wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT: Complete Preemption (Real-Time)
[...]
AFAIK this one.
Hm, I am currently trying PREEMPT_DESKTOP.
I got the impression _RT would be a bit of overkill for audio work.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:32, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 05:12 -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
Right now, Con's patch does 1 and 3, while Ingo's does 1 and 2 (though
Con says Ingo's patch could also do 3).
Ingo's patch allows 3 to be done in userspace, by an RT watchdog
process
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:31, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, I'm getting really confused, I thought that the realtime lsm was
the one that was in 'mm (maybe none of them are?). Finally I found the
followup article on lwn that mentioned
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 10:16, Jussi Laako wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 13:29 +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Excuse me my ignorance, but:
Is the spec open enough to create n-channel masters? Are there consumer
players in existence with more than two channels out? (and here I do not
mean
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 12:54, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:16:14PM +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
You can play high quality 5.1 or 2.0 audio from SACD discs.
And do nothing else with then at all. It's a completely closed format.
And those also play on standard CD players.
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 12:15, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:25:31AM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Yes, it is simply a temporary backwards compatibility workaround to
change formats.
The second layer is _not_ mandatory in the standard. That is, at some
point
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 05:40, Dave Phillips wrote:
Walco wrote:
Hi Mimo,
I have put online the beginngs of a concept paper for an audio
program I have been wanting to write for quite a while now. I
wondered whether you could give me some feedback on it and share some
of your
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way for me to re-order the OSS (not alsa)
midi devices that show up from sndstat?
The reason is I am using the SB-live! soundcard and am
unable to record input in rosegarden21 because it
records midi from the first device (#0)
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 02:07, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano hat gesagt: // Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Why I think this is a yes. Any kernel that wants to use the realtime-lsm
will have to either not build the POSIX capabilities lsm, or build it as
a module
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 12:28, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 14:41 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Read on here:
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/bugtraq/2004-12/0390.html
Wow, this is a HORRIBLE bug.
Indeed. I tried it and it works. Someone should have been
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 06:36, Stefan Turner wrote:
Thanks Fons and Rui for replies, sorry this is so
late, been off the net. The extra flags worked ok, but
there's still problems which I guess are due to CCRMA
using jack-audio-connection-kit instead of jack...
jack-audio-connection-kit _is_
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:35, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:17 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 12:28, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 14:41 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Read on here:
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:15, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 21:51 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:35, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:17 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 12:28, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2004
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 08:00, Esben Stien wrote:
Marek Peteraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
perhaps if more and more ATI customers went for their older cards,
they'd certainly be forced to rethink their policy.
That's what I did. I've been waiting for years to get a new 3d chip,
going to
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:48, Paul Davis wrote:
The point is not that someone might reverse engineer and do a
worse/better oss driver. The point is that nvidia, ati, xgi, matrox
*should* do open source drivers.
The point is that nobody has persuaded them of this, and in the matrox
case, they
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:54, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:52, Jan Depner wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
I would like nothing better than to switch to an open source driver
for exactly the reason you set forth.
If you need max performance then
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:49, Paul Davis wrote:
Oh sure they can, as it was the case with iriver.
2 years ago their forums were full of hatefilled msgs just because
people demanded ogg vorbis and were ignored.(or at least it seemed so,
no response from iriver).
there's no proof that it was
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 15:09, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 05:32:30PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
I'd rather not have people with this ignorant 'closed drivers = good'
opinion turning Linux into yet another Windows. If you want a sh***y
proprietary OS, there's plenty to
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 15:55, Marek Peteraj wrote:
The latest hatefilled posts on the RME list about the ALSA driver issue are
surely not helpful
Saying nothing is *never* helpful.
That is true.
Showing your dissatisfaction at least *sometimes* helps. We'll see.
[disclaimer: I have not
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 19:49, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:27, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 15:55, Marek Peteraj wrote:
The latest hatefilled posts on the RME list about the ALSA driver issue
are
surely not helpful
Saying nothing
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 03:51, Paul Davis wrote:
Am Sonntag 14 November 2004 09:57 schrieb Spencer Russell:
I got the latest alsa-drivers from CVS, compiled and installed
them, and it's still freezing up. I can have the modules loaded
for as long as I like, but it's when I start jack that it
32 matches
Mail list logo
