Well, its time for another release of Ardour. This release is another
milestone: it marks the end of all bugs that were slated to be solved
before the 1.0 release. The plan from here is to wait for about a few
days to allow testing of this release and minor (cosmetic) bug fixing
to continue, and
I am happy to announce the release of Ardour 0.9beta22. With over a
hundred notable new items, and only a handful of bug fixes between
this and 0.99, this is a significant release of Ardour.
Ardour's bug tracking database continues to have 260+ live bug reports
and feature requests, and there are
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:15:49PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
At some point, the PH line goes on strike. That is, when in
play or recording, it doesn't move. The two counters in the
transport pane are rolling but the PH remains fixed until the
next stop, when it will jump into its proper
At some point, the PH line goes on strike. That is, when in
play or recording, it doesn't move. The two counters in the
transport pane are rolling but the PH remains fixed until the
next stop, when it will jump into its proper place.
I'm not sure what triggers this, it could be the creation of
a
This is intended to be the last beta release before Ardour 0.9 is
released. No new features will be added before we release 0.9.
FYI, 0.9 is intended to differ from 1.0 only with respect to bug
fixes, install and first-time user experience. We do still have a few
significant crashing and other
How to export multichannel (3+ channels) sound-files from ardour
sessions?
(I tried piping to arecord -c6... but it didnt work
immediately, got confused, gave up and used clm instead.)
cheers,
-anders
(not the feature complete release I was planning, but the list
of changes is enough to warrant a new beta number)
Changes since 0.9beta18.4:
* optimization flags patch from rob holland
* drag-n-drop onto the editor track area where there is no track
creates an appropriate track
Hallo,
Dave Phillips hat gesagt: // Dave Phillips wrote:
Btw, where can I get Softwerk now ? Is there an announcement on the way ?
Huh, I thought, Softwark was on hold? Is there a new version?
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org__
Hallo,
Dave Phillips hat gesagt: // Dave Phillips wrote:
Btw, where can I get Softwerk now ? Is there an announcement on the way ?
Huh, I thought, Softwark was on hold? Is there a new version?
ok, the word is out :)
dave asked me innocently about softwerk on the train from
paris-bordeaux. i
Greetings Earthlings:
Just a quick note to say that the August 2004 issue of the Linux
Journal has selected Ardour as Project Of The Year for its 2004 Editors
Choice awards. Congratulations to Paul and everyone on the team !
Best regards,
dp
Yes! i was just about to write the list this very same message!
---
NQuit
www.nquit.com
---
- Original Message -
From: Dave Phillips
Sent: 7/13/2004 11:43:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Ardour named Project Of The Year by LJ
Greetings
Yes! i was just about to write the list this very same message!
is there a link available yet?
Choice awards. Congratulations to Paul and everyone on the team !
aw crap, i'm gonna to have mess with the website again :)
--p
Sorry for the wrong (maybe) post...
Trying the Ardour download of beta 17 I noticed 38.6 Mb of source code while
nightly tarball is 1.7 Megs... Some package error maybe or all is ok??? I
don't think autoconf/automake script generation will require 36 Mb
Cheers,
--
J_Zar
something went wrong with make dist and the file that was uploaded
was abnormally large. it will be corrected around lunchtime (EST)
today. sorry for the confusion.
Less SNAFU's, Less bytes, More Features
This release is more or less identical to yesterdays 0.9beta17, but
its only about 3MB instead of 35MB+, and looping while running in sync
with JACK is sort-of working. Packagers please take note.
Next release expected in less than 8 days but more than
Just a FYI. Those of you on ardour-dev will have parts of this list in
various latest CVS commit messages. People using old versions of
ardour should update. This new beta has lots of great stuff, with more
to come. The new Mantis bug reporting/tracking system is making life
way better for
I used audacity recently and it seems to work fine. The only
downside is I think it uses wxWindows, which I hate, but I've
even installed that to run it...
Nick/
On Thursday 24 Oct 2002 9:23 pm, you wrote:
Does it have a built in Wave editor?
No.
Depends :)
The editor will let you
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:49:40PM +0100, Lea Anthony wrote:
Does it have a built in Wave editor?
No.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Welcome to Muppet Labs, where the future is made - today!
Does it have a built in Wave editor? I can't see anything in the
features list or FAQ.
-Lea.
and that's why i use mine as a secondary card for non-rt programs (hey, it
puts out good sound with low noise, so it's still useful) like playing cds
and mp3s.
Yeah, that's what I do, too. I bought a Hoontech Digital XG with the
digital bracket. So I have nice optical digital outputs and can
hi,
has any one got this card to work with ardour ?
I've seen a few postings related, but it's still
not clear to if there are settings that will work
or if the card is just not supported ...
yes I know where to change the fragment count, but
the values I tried didn't change much of the
has any one got this card to work with ardour ?
I've seen a few postings related, but it's still
not clear to if there are settings that will work
or if the card is just not supported ...
yes I know where to change the fragment count, but
the values I tried didn't change much of the situation.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, CK wrote:
has any one got this card to work with ardour ? I've seen a few
postings related, but it's still not clear to if there are settings
that will work or if the card is just not supported ...
yes I know where to change the fragment count, but the values I tried
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
my recollection, as mentioned, is that the ymfpci card is quite odd in
that it does not allow integral interrupts-per-buffer. instead, it
fixes the interrupt frequency regardless of buffer size.
since understanding latency is important in a DAW, the
as promised, as of CVS this evening (i got in with about 15 mins to
spare), ardour now supports export of selected markers as CD track
markers to a plain text file. the internals of the export methodology
have also been altered to make support for direct-burn-to-CD
relatively straightforward. too
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:12, Paul Davis wrote:
...
The problem is that the bookkeeping is based only on what the .spec
file declares. Since this is never comparable to the kinds of tests
that ./configure performs, the bookkeeping is inadequate as a way to
test for compile or run-time
Paul Davis wrote:
Don't know original author...tongue-in-cheek response
Please, would people stop building libraries or binaries from source on
a package-based system? It causes so many problems. If you are
building a tool from source and it needs library X, I energetically
encourage you
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:40:45PM -0500, Kevin Conder wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Paul Davis wrote:
Please, would people stop using RPM's or any package system for that
matter to install libraries that they need to use with applications
that they have to compile from source?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:15:29PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
then you haven't done much with C++ libraries, especially since the
debacle of RH's move to gcc 2.96, which broke binary compatibility
with g++ 2.95. not only that, but i have heard that there were
intermediate versions of gcc they
I was unable to reach the address listed in Ardour's author file, and
wondered if maybe someone here could answer an install question on it?
Basically, I have libsndfile installed via rpm, and I can guarantee it
exists:
# ldconfig -p | grep libsndfile
libsndfile.so.0 (libc6) =
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
Bingo, give this man a cigar! libsndfile-devel installs a symlink. A
*broken* sym link going to nowhere. The configure script is looking for
libsndfile.so. Not libsndfile.so.0 or .1. The sym link that the devel
installed for me was:
libsndfile.so -
With respect to Paul's suggestion that installing libraries from
packages is asking for trouble, I beg to differ. I'm inclined to
think that if packages cause trouble, it's that there's a bug
somewhere, either in the package or in the app. Lib packages are
not inherently broken IMHO ; they
Kevin Conder wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
Bingo, give this man a cigar! libsndfile-devel installs a symlink. A
*broken* sym link going to nowhere. The configure script is looking for
libsndfile.so. Not libsndfile.so.0 or .1. The sym link that the devel
installed for
In what way is ALSA 0.9.0beta broken? The only trouble it's given me
is syncing sound with images watching DVDs...
if you install 0.9beta5, then nothing will work because alsa.conf is
installed in the wrong place. nothing much to experience ALSA beta
users, but rather suprising to everyone else
34 matches
Mail list logo
