On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:51, Fred Gleason wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Son of Zev wrote:
At this stage I am unaware of any precedent to this kind of claim. The
claim against mp3/p2p software was an issue of music copyright and the
illegal distribution of it - however no one ever sued anyone
Hi All
Hey I know this is a rather late comment - but I read everyone elses
contribution and I feel I should add.
At this stage I am unaware of any precedent to this kind of claim. The claim
against mp3/p2p software was an issue of music copyright and the illegal
distribution of it -
can't see that in the terms. (and a personal request to make it truly viable
for both audio and video put SMPTE/MMC sync functionality on to it... so it
can lock to external video and audio devices correctly - I know Paul -
wordclock would be paramount too)
FYI: wordclock is a h/w issue.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Son of Zev wrote:
At this stage I am unaware of any precedent to this kind of claim. The claim
against mp3/p2p software was an issue of music copyright and the illegal
distribution of it - however no one ever sued anyone for making a recordable
tape deck or video
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Sander van Zoest wrote:
I am not sure what to do about it, but I am not surprised and I hope
there is something we can do to fight this and get our rights back.
Go for the criminal prosecution angle. There is a pretty clear case of
price fixing among the distributors and
Hi all,
This is truly sad. This has been one of my favourite
pieces of Linux audio software. I guess their are many
possibilities for this latest development. I think the
fact that Broadcast was always on the edge of the open
source thing ( b2000 that is ), I always thought that
something would
That's why the ogg-vorbis group created a non-profit,
to make themselves into a legal charity entity. Same
thing with the freesoftware foundation, I guess beyond
that we can all move to moscow!
--- Sander van Zoest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Dave Phillips wrote:
See the
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
matthias
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:02:39PM -0700, brian redfern wrote:
It should help the sales of the new nostarch press
book on bcast. I have a copy of the last released
source, I've got a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:31:21PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no warranty. as a post on slashdot
points out, Microsoft could
We are in hard times right now and it almost at a point where I agree
with the Broadcast 2000 folks that maybe pulling out and avoiding being
taken advantage of until we find a way to fight for our rights is a
sad, but potential way I have to go.
Any ideas?
If artists avoid to get
Brian,
are you planning to maintain the current bcast2000 code, or start
something new? There are a few patches on
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/heroines, some of them contributed
by myself, and I'm working on some other improvements as well. If you
(or others) decide to maintain the
Matthias Weiss wrote:
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
matthias
Appears to be gone from there!
--
Wendell Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anncrman.com
Show me the country in which there are no strikes and I'll
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:42:10PM +0200, Nicolas Noble wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Matthias Weiss wrote:
There's still the download page at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13554
Wrong... What's still downloadable are the 'around' librairies and
tools. The
Is anyone planning on picking this up? I'd do it myself if I had a)
time and b) better coding skills. BC2K is/was a fine piece of work.
Ruben Merz wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
RUben
Greetings:
See the short
If artists avoid to get contracts with this media industry, this industry will
eventually be useless. We made them as powerful as they are today, only
we can take away their power again.
If artists and consumers are happy (as it seems today) I see no way out
except for some niches.
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
RUben
Greetings:
See the short story on Slashdot, or get the scoop (such as it is) at
the BC2K Web site.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/10/2016257mode=thread
I second that, maybe it could be forked off as a part
of the oggvorbis project, as they have created a
foundation to protect themselves from liabilities.
Apparently heroine virtual was actually getting hit
with some real suit or suits, so it wasn't just a
theoretical threat, I perhaps this is
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no warranty. as a post on slashdot
At 16:58 9/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
I second that, maybe it could be forked off as a part
of the oggvorbis project, as they have created a
foundation to protect themselves from liabilities.
Apparently heroine virtual was actually getting hit
with some real suit or suits, so it wasn't just a
Paul Davis wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit, though i'd want to speak to a
lawyer before concluding that completely. GPL'ed software is almost
universally made available with no
Sad indeed, and (yet) another reason that the expansion of
``intellectual property'' laws over the past decade or so is so
counterproductive.
Worst is that the RIAA has demonstrated themselves to be such total,
clueless idiots in the matter. In their fear of having a few copies
pirated, they're
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, ljp wrote:
At 16:58 9/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
This goes with the current state of the USA and the suit happy atmosphere
here, and people not taking responsibility for themselves and their actions
anymore.
Personally I think it might have to do with this
Its most likely his employer (pioneer) told him to
stop coding or they'd fire or sue him.
--- D. Stimits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Davis wrote:
Well, that's really sad. Let's hope that some
people may go on with the
previous GPL code...
it also strikes me as mostly bullshit,
It should help the sales of the new nostarch press
book on bcast. I have a copy of the last released
source, I've got a download spot for those who want a
copy, just email me back. Personally I'm going to
study the code and use it to teach myself c/c++, as
its very optimized and stable. Then I
24 matches
Mail list logo
