Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux dsp additions

2003-06-17 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: I wrote a carefully worded and encouraging message to their support department. They are a successful company with a broad base of users, so Didn't they just file for chapter 11? By the power of google...

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux dsp additions

2003-06-17 Thread Lea Anthony
Well, being a creamware user myself, I have to say that it is seriously impressive hardware. I would be interested in joining a Linux Pulsar group. I can give a little finance and programming cycles :) -Lea. On Wednesday 18 June 2003 15:53, happyguy wrote: So based on the feedback from the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux dsp additions

2003-06-17 Thread Jay Vaughan
Is this avenue worth pursuing further, or should I look beyond a $1700 PwPulsar and find another DSP/DAW dev platform? Anyone have any leads? I ran into TCelectronics Powercore Firewire which seems decently assembled, but I do not know of any Linux efforts being made on this... I would say give

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux dsp additions

2003-06-17 Thread Jay Vaughan
I wonder: Does a company like that have to enter into any binding agreements with Microsoft and/or Apple ? Creamware makes hardware, but their drivers and other softwares are only available for Win/Mac platforms, and so far they've shown no interest in sharing sources. Is it in part because of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux dsp additions

2003-06-17 Thread Paul Davis
Is this avenue worth pursuing further, or should I look beyond a $1700 PwPulsar and find another DSP/DAW dev platform? Anyone have any leads? I ran into TCelectronics Powercore Firewire which seems decently assembled, but I do not know of any Linux efforts being made on this... I would say give