Hi,
Erik de Castro Lopo hat gesagt: // Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would consider a much more fundamental problem with sweep (which the
author has plans to fix at some point) is the assumption that the
audio data will fit in memory. this just isn't viable for working with
music rather than audio clips.
gnoise doesn't
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:18:43 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
*if* sweep uses floats or ints to represent audio data in memory (a
big *if*) then 10 minutes of 48kHz 2 channel audio is about 219MB:
Its float internall IIRC.
i would consider a much more fundamental problem with sweep (which the
Thanks for your help guys! Does anyone of you guys/authors know if there
is a standard way to indicate marker positions of a given audio file
when starting up the process?
I mean, wouldn't it be great if each app saw -MS and -ME on the command
line to indicate the marker positions of the given
Is this any better than having the file format have the markers in
it? WAVE and OGG have this. I imeplemented it in ReZound's native
format as well. (clicking around on the horizontal ruler lets you edit
the markers).The only probably is that (for ReZound) I had to make
some changes
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:18:43PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
Is this really of any use? I never recorded with sweep (I use
ecasound), but when I tried to load a 10 minute ogg file into sweep,
it refused this because of exhausted memory. I have 256 MB, that
should be enough for 10 minutes of
Steve Harris wrote:
gnoise doesn't do this, and neither does snd. i am not sure about
audacity, but i suspect it doesn't either.
Audacity, and glame use disk paging.
IMHO sweep has the best UI (speed, clarity, usability), its a shame about
the RAM thing, but maybe thats why its so fast.
-
On 24 Oct 2002, Lea Anthony wrote:
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are seen as
potentially really good under Linux?
snd, http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/CCRMA/Software/snd/snd.html (superior)
sweep,
I just spent several hours last night comparing three different editors.
Basically, all of them have something to recommend, and
I plan on keeping all of them on my system. The skinny:
Snd: My old favorite. Easy to use, keeps getting better, but a bit
ugly still. Nonetheless, I know how to
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button in the bottom left corner of
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:38:52 -0400
David Gerard Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweep: Loads of fun, fast, pretty, nice use of LADSPA plugins. Still
no way to record directly into the program from an external source.
Yes there is.
The little red icon/button
Well, I don't know why I haven't announced it here yet, but... I'm the
author of ReZound
http://rezound.sourceforge.net
check it out...
-- Davy
Lea Anthony wrote:
I'm trying to get a picture in my mind as to what is out there. Could
someone please give me a list of Wave editors that are
12 matches
Mail list logo
