I found some definitions in boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp, with gcc,
win32, etc. flavors. I still haven't figured out how they are used! But
at least there is source to play with.
- mo
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 22:13, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Michael Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this message
Michael Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found some definitions in boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp, with gcc,
win32, etc. flavors. I still haven't figured out how they are used! But
at least there is source to play with.
Excellent!
Most of this is C++ language bindings for the low-level
I know this message is ancient, but if you are still looking for atomic
primitives I just ran across some in the boost code base. I can't figure
out how to use them (!) but perhaps you can? Boost, if you don't know,
seems to be kind of a proving ground for the C++ working group. Lots of
libraries
Michael Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this message is ancient, but if you are still looking for atomic
primitives I just ran across some in the boost code base. I can't figure
out how to use them (!) but perhaps you can? Boost, if you don't know,
seems to be kind of a proving ground
Hi Jack,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:35:55PM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Which version of atomicity.h do you use? I see more than one in my
Debian woody system.
I always copy the right one for the arch I wish to support.
To compile my application for all supported platforms, I would need to
Ingo Oeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(*) glibc seems to have a good set of functions internally
AFAICT, these are for the library's own use, not part of the
supported external interface. I'll investigate further.
These I use myself and I can recommend them, as long as
Hi Jack,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 02:05:27PM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Ingo Oeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(*) glibc seems to have a good set of functions internally
These I use myself and I can recommend them, as long as you use
GCC or a compatible compiler. They are made for user
Ingo Oeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I copy the relevant atomicity.h, since glibc gives me no other
choice. They are trivial anyway.
Which version of atomicity.h do you use? I see more than one in my
Debian woody system.
To compile my application for all supported platforms, I would need to
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:56:09PM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
All I've found so far are...
(*) kernel implementations of asm/atomic.h and asm/system.h.
Don't use these, if glibc supports your architecture.
But, I prefer to avoid using kernel header files in application
I am looking for a good set of portable, supported atomic.h-style
primitives for userspace applications. I am not especially interested
in the low-level functions defined in asm/atomic.h. I really want
something more powerful like the kernel's compare_and_swap(),
cmpxchg(), test_and_set(),
10 matches
Mail list logo
