On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:35:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
I've been experimenting with Torben's LSM for the 2.6 kernel, and the
realtime group permissions mechanism we discussed.
Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
tolerate the use of setgid...
uhh...
Hello,
I am looking for a deconvolver, that is able to produce impulse
responses from sinus sweeps (and especially the exponentially
sweeping sine wave introduced by Farina).
Do you have any suggestions or at least tips to start an
implementation by myself?
Recently I managed to use the mls
I would be interested in this project too. What I'm looking for is
actuallay an anti-reverb that will be able to cancel reverbs in a
listening room, well always in conjunction with the listener position.
The other useful thing would be a phase-filter to correct the phases
coming out from a two or
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:35:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
tolerate the use of setgid...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hmm... perhaps we trick the binary by setting the gid back
to the e_gid after enabling capabilities :)
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution, then
the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't suppose the GTK
developers are likely to take the test out just because we ask them.
Have we tried? It seems
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution,
then the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't
suppose the GTK developers are likely to take
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Jesper Anderson wrote:
GTK has been like that for years now. Check the archives of SLASH'EM,
a Nethack clone, for lots of back and forth. In short, they're not
going to change.
Do they have a valid reason? Or are they just imposing their paranoia on
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:35, Jack O'Quin wrote:
I've been experimenting with Torben's LSM for the 2.6 kernel, and the
realtime group permissions mechanism we discussed.
Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
tolerate the use of setgid...
(process:11284):
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:13:48PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Jesper Anderson wrote:
GTK has been like that for years now. Check the archives of SLASH'EM,
a Nethack clone, for lots of back and forth. In short, they're not
going to change.
Do they
So, I modified Torben's LSM to check supplementary groups, and this
seems to work fine. From a system admin perspective it's pretty good.
I'm a member of group `audio', which was accomplished by adding my
user ID (joq) to the appropriate entry in /etc/group...
[...]
well
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The sgid approach is in addition to having a realtime group or
instead? I have the feeling I have missed something in the thread.
The setgid approach *is* a match on the realtime group. The question
is which of several group IDs to you
As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
into account?
disclaimer: I don't have any cool music to release (yet), although I
The sgid approach is in addition to having a realtime group or
instead? I have the feeling I have missed something in the thread.
The setgid approach *is* a match on the realtime group. The question
is which of several group IDs to you actually match against. Torben's
jackcaps-0.2
I apologizer if this has been discussed, but I haven't read the whole
thread. Has the idea of a simple sched_rr helper been discussed?
It can be setuid and only executable by a specific group.
rtsched my_rt_app
setscheduler
drop privs
exec
I guess that doesn't help
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the clarification, I was getting confused... so the GTK
problem only happens if you try to tag executables only for realtime
access.
Right. GTK complains if its executable uses either setuid or setgid.
This is regrettable,
Tim Hockin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I apologizer if this has been discussed, but I haven't read the whole
thread. Has the idea of a simple sched_rr helper been discussed?
Roger Larsson has an rt_monitor program that can do most of what you
suggest. It also limits the fraction of the CPU
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:27 pm, Hans Fugal wrote:
As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
into account?
Personally, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
