[linux-audio-dev] Kontakt Lenste yeni yil firsati 1 Kutu Lens 35 Milyon USTELIK ADRESE TESLIM KACIRMAYIN__0_6357474__

2003-02-12 Thread _linux-audio-dev
En ucuz lensler icin lutfen tiklayin. Bir telefonla adrese teslim. http://www.akdenizgoz.com Akdeniz Goz Merkezi FevzipaĂľa No:73 Fatih0 212 635 74 74 Listeden cikmak icin [EMAIL PROTECTED]adresine bos mail gonderiniz

[linux-audio-dev] fund transfer

2003-02-12 Thread william ume
Dear Sir, My name is William Ume, Presently,I am working in an African country. I got your contact via the internet and felt you may be willing to pursue this with me. This proposal may sound strange to you or probably you may even think it is a joke,because of lots of funny mails

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because working on it has come close to exhausting my financial resources. Paul, could you tell me how I can support you financially ? Do you work through Paypal ?

[linux-audio-dev] binary package of ardour - can be found in SuSE 8.1 (earlier?)

2003-02-12 Thread Roger Larsson
~ rpm -q ardour-cvs20020816-21 ardour-cvs20020816-21 roger@jeloin:~ man rpm Reformatting rpm(8), please wait... Still saving the page, please wait... roger@jeloin:~ rpm -q ardour-cvs20020816-21 -i Name: ardour Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : cvs20020816

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Ivica Bukvic
when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there will be binaries. --p Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] binary package of ardour - can be found in SuSE 8.1 (earlier?)

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
they did this against my wishes. i have asked several distributions to stop doing this, including suse. this being the gpl, there's not much more i can do. --p

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version? i would prefer that nobody be using ardour at this time that doesn't have the skills to use CVS and the compilation toolset. there are frequently daily updates, and i'd much

Re: [linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding

2003-02-12 Thread janne halttunen
On 13 Feb 2003 01:38:13 +1100 Son of Zev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to all those that have had the courtesy to respond. I have also learnt and spent much time

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:33:24PM -0500, Ivica Bukvic wrote: Do I/we have at least your permission (if we do manage to compile out of CVS) to redistribute my/our compiled version? I think this is covered by section 6 in the GPL: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html 6. Each time you

[linux-audio-dev] While we're talking about lack of responses :-)

2003-02-12 Thread Ivica Bukvic
I e-mailed the list a couple of days ago asking for some advice regarding my RTMix app (how to make it more user-friendly). I am still waiting for some help on this one :-D. Again, any insight is greatly appreciated! Sincerely, P.S. Web server hosting my page is still down, thanks to the smart

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is ...

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:21:42PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote: and the rest ... I get this. Its pathetic. Not only that ... I have no idea how much longer I can keep working on Ardour right now because working on it has come close to exhausting my financial resources. Paul, could you

Re: [linux-audio-dev] While we're talking about lack of responses :-)

2003-02-12 Thread Jack O'Quin
Ivica Bukvic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I e-mailed the list a couple of days ago asking for some advice regarding my RTMix app (how to make it more user-friendly). I am still waiting for some help on this one :-D. Again, any insight is greatly appreciated! OK, here goes. My insight into

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] While we're talking about lack of responses:-)

2003-02-12 Thread iriXx
hi ico, i'm seriously interested in looking at the user-friendliness issue as im working on a library of pixmaps (png) that developers can use for their apps... this came from the whole discussion about why we need graphic designers ;-) i've downloaded RTMix and will have a good look at it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] While we're talking about lack of responses :-)

2003-02-12 Thread Dave Griffiths
I might be a bit OT here, but this is always interesting for interface design: http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Essentials/AquaHIGuidelines/ Not saying I agree with it all, but details like the layout of buttons on dialog boxes on this page are interesting:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] While we're talking about lack of responses :-)

2003-02-12 Thread Conrad Parker
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:40:53AM +, Dave Griffiths wrote: http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Essentials/AquaHIGuidelines/ I think as linux developers, we could find something similar very handy - especially if it was toolkit agnostic. Has anyone heard of something like this?

RE: [linux-audio-dev] While we're talking about lack of responses :-)

2003-02-12 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Thanks for your reply! Personally, I am rather against the Apple's layout and usability ideas (for that matter I am also against the KDE's outdated usability guidelines as well) since it has proven to be nothing but a nightmare for the computer illiterate (or barely literate) students whom I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:49:08AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: (cut) jazz++ has been around for a long time, and is available as a binary. why isn't it widely loved and used? because it really isn't very good. i know that i tried to use it many times, and found it, well, frankly i found it completely

[linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Allan Klinbail
Hi Guys This is quite a disturbing message.. nearly 2 weeks ago Paul Davis marked one of my messages as something seriously wrong going on .. when libraries were compiling as dynamic not static... since then I have responded with full outputs of what is happening. In response I sent full

Re: [linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Vincent Touquet
I'm not a real coder either (so one might argue I shouldn't be on linux-audio-dev, but I'm just interested in the discussions), so I think I understand the root cause of your grief. I think if (if) the Ardour developers are _expecting_ quality feedback from normal users (not just programmers) at

Re: [linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
I think if (if) the Ardour developers are _expecting_ quality feedback from normal users (not just programmers) at this stage, they should provide tarballs of the stable CVS snapshots they want to be tested. But maybe they want to wait for 1.0 before letting endusers test it? In that case, maybe

[linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
I have done everything I have asked of me from the list, including Paul's responses ..and also taken my own initiatives following lack of response and still have recieved no response. [ ... ] Aside from being upset, it appears to me that you guys are all a bunch of hypocrites.. Asking for

Re: [linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding are you all just abunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Son of Zev
Thanks Vincent. Your reply is appreciated. However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to all those that have had the courtesy to respond. I have also learnt and spent much time investigating problems

Re: [linux-audio-dev] why is no-one responding are you all just abunch of *^%^%^ wits???]

2003-02-12 Thread Allan Klinbail
-Forwarded Message- From: Son of Zev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Alsa-dev Thanks Vincent. Your reply is appreciated. However I have been involved in the ardour lists for over 2 years. I have spent much time reading about potential problems and responded to all those

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all justa bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread ljp
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:44, Paul Davis wrote: So I've wasted 2+ years of my life and countless dollars continuing down this path. Do you know how much of my life and money I've spent continuing down this path? In return for getting up every day for 3+ years (bar some months in the summer)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Davis
If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard about it. Why not release something? because i am tired of downloading open source projects

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one respondingare you all just a bunch of *^%^%^ wits???

2003-02-12 Thread ljp
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:49, Paul Davis wrote: If you are interested, I am sure people would pay for binaries of ardour.I would. I know other musicans that would.I could get more musicans to. Personally, I have been waiting for it since I first heard about it. Why not release something?