Hi,
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takashi did some nice latency testing of the current kernel
Good question. I had already read that and was curious myself. Also, how about
2.6.6-mm1? I want to upgrade to Fedora Core 2 and a new kernel so I can quit
pissing off Paul D. and the guys with my 2.96 gcc ;-)
Jan
On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:50 , Robert Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Hi,
As a
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takashi
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:44:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
At 12:50 AM 11/05/2004, Robert Jonsson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] ia32: 4Kb stacks (and irqstacks) patch
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is a patch to enable 4Kb stacks for x86. The goal of this is to
1) Reduce footprint per thread so that
On Mon, 10 May 2004 06:44, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
so far, alsa-firmware package is released from the understanding of 1
as data. but if someone insists it as program, yes, it can be a
problem.
I tend to look at it (very conveniently, of course) as neither. I view
it as part
Robert Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[...]
So... humbly asking, is it time yet to make the switch? :-)
Maybe. If you do and you're using the realtime LSM, you're going to
need the latest (beta)
