Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Steve Harris
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:12:13 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 10:50:31PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: I dont really see the avantage of this - control and description are seperate tasks, and not even closely related. Very closely related if you consider that the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Steve Harris
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 12:40:58 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: There's maybe a 'political' motivation behind my point of vieuw: forcing application writers to use a library to access an otherwise undocumented interface reminds me too much of some commercial practices that I dislike. I really

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Mike Rawes
On Sat, 15 May 2004 07:10:30 +0200 Marcus Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Marcus Andersson wrote: Alfons Adriaensen wrote: Another point. I've defended the adoption of simple integer enumerations

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Mike Rawes
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:15:39 +0100 Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:08:53 +0100, Mike Rawes wrote: Minor nitpick regarding what is carried over as metadata from 1.x: Can we get rid of the label? - I never did see the use for it. The ID is sufficient for

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Marcus Andersson
Mike Rawes wrote: You're right - there's an asymptote at x=0 - there's no correct way of dealing with it. What I've done in the past is do linear conversion near 0: to linear: value e : log(value) -e : -log(-value) : value / e to logarithmic value 1 : exp(value) -1 :

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Mike Rawes
On Sat, 15 May 2004 11:46:47 +0200 Marcus Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Rawes wrote: You're right - there's an asymptote at x=0 - there's no correct way of dealing with it. What I've done in the past is do linear conversion near 0: to linear: value e : log(value)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] 3. Linux Audio Conference 2005

2004-05-15 Thread Frank NEUMANN
Hi all, Matthias Nagorni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: after the successful 2. Linux Audio Conference, ZKM has offered to host the conference again next year. We have now fixed the date for the event: 3. Linux Audio Conference 21.-24. April 2005 ZKM, Karlsruhe, Germany

[linux-audio-dev] strange issue with libsndfile

2004-05-15 Thread martin rumori
hi *, i've got a strange issue with libsndfile. in foo (http://foo.sf.net) the SFM_RDWR mode is used, because target soundfiles are created independently of the write process before, then the file gets opened with SFM_RDWR to determine the target soundfile's parameters (samplerate, channels...).

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Steve Harris
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:04:24 +0100, Mike Rawes wrote: Actually I'd like to get rid if the UID (its useless for generated plugins and has a significant adminstrative overhead) and just roll it into the label with a URI scheme. that way everyone can administer thier own unique ID

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] 3. Linux Audio Conference 2005

2004-05-15 Thread Jack O'Quin
Frank NEUMANN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/contrib/zkm_meeting_2004/photos/ Thanks for the photos, Frank. Can you (or anyone) name all the people in this group picture?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] 3. Linux Audio Conference 2005

2004-05-15 Thread Richard Bown
On Saturday 15 May 2004 16:53, Jack O'Quin wrote: Can you (or anyone) name all the people in this group picture? http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/contrib/zkm_meeting_2004/photos/frank_neum ann-misc/LAConf2004/DSCN2917.JPG I can name, erm, four I think. That's a bit poor. A pretty low beard

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:10:30AM +0200, Marcus Andersson wrote: Interesting interpretation. This means that the mapping between the slider and the parameter will be f(x) = k*a^x with k=f(0) and a = f(1) if the slider goes form 0 to 1. You probably meant a = f(1)/f(0). This also

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

2004-05-15 Thread Steve Harris
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 02:43:17 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: A. a description of a plugin's interface, B. a set of commands that make a host accomodate the plugin ? It depends on the task the app is trying to achieve, if its trying to find a plugin thats a compressor with stereo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] strange issue with libsndfile

2004-05-15 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sat, 15 May 2004 14:08:59 +0200 martin rumori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi *, i've got a strange issue with libsndfile. Nope, its a bug :-). am i missing something, or is this a bug in libsndfile? attached my test prog. Thanks, I love small test cases like this. Please try this