Es geschah am Sonntag, 4. Juli 2004 23:43 als Albert Graef schrieb:
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
I never heard about the Prony algorithm, but if it does what you
describe then it's easy to implement, isn't it? Have you tried it? Any
problems? Or are you concerned about performance?
No, I
Howdy, list:
Does a signal handler (like segfault, or divide by zero) run at the
priority of the thread that it gets generated for?
Say thread 1 is normal prio and thread 2 is SCHED_RR thread. In normal
operation thread 1 can't interrupt or supersede thread 2. Does this hold
if, say, thread 1
Hi,
This is great news, Ingo Molnar strikes back with a low latency patch for
2.6 !
See the original message here :
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Voluntary+Kernel+Preemption+Patchlr=ie=UTF-8selm=2g8rY-7zF-11%40gated-at.bofh.itrnum=1
Direct link to the patch against 2.6.7-bk20 :
Michael Ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does a signal handler (like segfault, or divide by zero) run at the
priority of the thread that it gets generated for?
Those signals in particular are defined by POSIX to be synchronous,
meaning they should be delivered to the thread creating them. Thus
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 20:44, Thomas Charbonnel wrote:
Hi,
This is great news, Ingo Molnar strikes back with a low latency patch for
2.6 !
See the original message here :
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Voluntary+Kernel+Preemption+Patchlr=ie=UTF-8selm=2g8rY-7zF-11%40gated-at.bofh.itrnum=1
