Re: [linux-audio-dev] How non-programmers use documentation.

2001-08-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
Very good point. I could not put my finger on it, but you are right, what often stops you from sending bug reports is that you don't want to be taken for a fool :-). BR /Robert dany wrote: Le Lundi 27 Aot 2001 20:59, vous avez crit : 16. Non-programmers that I talked to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Real-Time IPC benchs

2001-09-04 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, very interesting reading. There seem to be some data corruption though. in the multiclient page in the next latency box the Linux latency value is 6 in the Win98 comparison case, and 12 in the Win2000 comparison. Which is right? --DOH! my fault, it's tested on different machines, perhaps

Re: [linux-audio-dev] VST plug-ins for Linux?

2001-09-07 Thread Robert Jonsson
Ah, my favourite subject, this is something I have spent quite some time to iron out. And yes, I think it is very possible. But I have a serious lack of time to try some implementations :-(. An even better example than the CrossOver plugin is the Codec plugs that have existed for some time

Re: [linux-audio-dev] VST plug-ins for Linux?

2001-09-07 Thread Robert Jonsson
n. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jarno Seppanen)Subject: [linux-audio-dev] VST plug-ins for Linux?Date: 07 Sep 2001 08:43:44 +0300 Hullo,since CodeWeavers' CrossOver allows Windows web browser plug-in binaries suchas Shockwave or QuickTime to run on Linux, I bet

[linux-audio-dev] Audio dependency rendering - an idea

2001-11-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi Guys, Here are some implementation ideas I conjured from thin air a while a go (perhaps that's all they contain), hope someone finds it interesting. And in case it's not patented yet(in case someone would WANT to patent it, go figure?!?), now there is prior art ;-). Recently there was a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio dependency rendering - an idea

2001-11-19 Thread Robert Jonsson
Paul Winkler wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 06:31:11PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: (long snip) I've thought about much the same thing. It's worth noting that, as long as you're working with tools that can be driven from the command line, make (1) can do all that - that's what it's

[linux-audio-dev] SCHED_FIFO has been broken

2001-11-22 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi all, Here is a snip from latest kernel release note: From: Linus Torvalds To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Date:21 Nov 2001 22:44:30 -0800 David Mosberger noticed that SCHED_FIFO has been broken for a while, and obviously very few people

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and JACK

2002-03-15 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, I think it's not so much XML as custom widgets. Some plugs will probably work better with specialised widgets that is perhaps only applicable to this particular plugin. Also there are some plugs where the GUI clearly adds clarity by using alternative visualisation. I'm for instance

Re: [linux-audio-dev] those latency numbers

2002-03-24 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, PS: I'm now using Redhat 7.2 boxes, and I noticed artsd is started as default. I don't like this that much because it messes up the correct functioning of some audio apps. Hmmm, I see... Eg mplayer AFAIK outputs to OSS (does not support arts output) and while artsd is running mplayer

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [OT] seriously screwed up Gtk installation?FOLLOW-UP

2002-04-16 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, Since I have yet to try Debian, I might change my religion also, if I do :-) For now I'm quite content with Mandrakes current offers, very slick, VERY uptodate. Not quite bugfree, but I've been with them for a while and know my way around. The latest releases (8.1 and 8.2) have also been

[linux-audio-dev] Reborn

2002-08-12 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, Anybody tried the (new?) Rebirth clone, Reborn? http://www.deadvirgins.org.uk/reborn/ Only had a 10 second test run, I'm already sold :-) Regards /Robert

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sweep 0.5.0 -- Scrubby's surprise

2002-08-13 Thread Robert Jonsson
Great stuff! Conrad Parker wrote: Sweep 0.5.0 Development Release --- Sweep is designed to be intuitive and to give you full control. It includes almost everything you would expect in a sound editor, and then some: * precise, vinyl like scrubbing

Re: [linux-audio-dev] What I think about reborn.

2002-08-16 Thread Robert Jonsson
I can only agree. Now if we PLEASE could leave this subject, I can see nothing good coming out of this discussion. We are different, we work different, we live different, that is that. If you are interested in politics, try a different mailinglist, join a political party or whatever.

[linux-audio-dev] (remotely linux related) emu10k independent wdm drivers with DSPcompiler

2002-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi Guys, I thought I'd mention this project that's been going on in that bad bad windows world to provide free wdm drivers for all emu10k based soundcards. It seems they've made quite a good job at that. I've heard reports that it is working in w2k with Cubase at 4ms latency with a standard

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-announce] Announce: Vstserver, vstlib, vstladspaand k_vst~

2002-11-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
Woah! Tack Kjetil! I've been meaning to construct something like this for a veery long time, I'm sincerely happy that you managed to pull it of! Sometime in the near/distant/close/far future I'll be able to test this (I'm not holding my breath), I can't wait! So...next step would be VST

[linux-audio-dev] Remedy for long compile times

2002-11-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi guys, I thought I would share some info about some utilities I found recently with regards to overly painful compile times. We have done some fairly extensive Corba based stuff at work, the last few months. Needless to say the compile times we have had for these beasts are numbing.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio s/w ui swallowing

2003-01-30 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Thursday 30 January 2003 18.12, Steve Harris wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:31:12 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tell app its windowname and swallow that... if app wnats to open another window then it has to tell the host app via IPC of its new window ID and then the host will

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio s/w ui swallowing

2003-01-31 Thread Robert Jonsson
Steve Harris wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:31:44 +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: Yes, but hat is done with a window manger hack, normal X apps can't do that. Are you sure this is the case? There are numerous applications that support swallowing. Some of them are quite small. Right now I

[linux-audio-dev] Re: Steve Harris' C++ v C benchmark

2003-02-16 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, I think that for applications like audio processing where speed is one of the main goals benchmarking is extremely important. Personally I would love to see more people do it properly and publish their results like I did here: Agreed. If someone that knows c, c++ and objective c were to

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Goodnews

2003-06-04 Thread Robert Jonsson
Good news yeah... sure... When I read the title I was hoping for something like: - Kernel 2.6 is tested reliably with 16-samples buffers... or something similar... :-) Oh well, I'll have to settle for the millions then... /R onsdagen den 4 juni 2003 05.17 skrev johnsonwilliams: Dear Sir,

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [MusE] More ideas :) [Track freeze] - Alsa Sequencer

2003-06-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
tisdagen den 10 juni 2003 13.21 skrev Frank van de Pol: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Robert Jonsson wrote: Hi, In fact the bounce feature in MusE is realtime. It means that you have to wait the real duration of the track to be rendered. In a non realtime mode the track

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [MusE] More ideas :) [Track freeze] - Alsa Sequencer

2003-06-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
tisdagen den 10 juni 2003 13.21 skrev Frank van de Pol: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Robert Jonsson wrote: Hi, In fact the bounce feature in MusE is realtime. It means that you have to wait the real duration of the track to be rendered. In a non realtime mode the track

[linux-audio-dev] NI Traktor

2003-06-12 Thread Robert Jonsson
This is a first for audio applications. Native Instruments Traktor just appeared on Freshmeat! :) I guess some people are starting to take notice of the OSS community. Though it isn't OSS in itself and not available for Linux (OS X, + a few marginal os:es). But the most interesting thing was

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.5.72 + ALSA + jack == happy monkey

2003-06-21 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, lördagen den 21 juni 2003 09.18 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wanted to post a quick success story with the 2.5 kernel series: Machine processor VIA C3 Ezra cpu MHz : 932.918 bogomips: 1843.20 256MB ram Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 AC97 Audio

Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtime compression

2003-06-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, Don't know if it's applicable, but there are finished apps for this (dunno about the 'high speed' part). E.g. http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ never tried it...but it's supposed to be rather good (?) /Robert måndagen den 23 juni 2003 18.50 skrev tzahm: Have a look at Speex

[linux-audio-dev] AudioScience GPL'd drivers

2003-06-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
So... I'm not exactly sure what these Guys are good for, audio cards for broadcast industry? Apparently they have GPL'd the interface code for their sound cards. They talk about DSP access also, but I guess it isn't *programmable* DSP, just access to what's already in there... If any one is

Re: [linux-audio-dev] OpenAFS and preemptible patch

2003-07-08 Thread Robert Jonsson
tisdagen den 8 juli 2003 11.53 skrev Maarten de Boer: http://shfs.sourceforge.net/ LUFS looks quite a bit more mature. http://lufs.sourceforge.net/lufs/ Yeah, I've tried it with the ftp file system, incredibly cool. But I wonder if it is that great in a LAN, it might not be that

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] horgand and morgan

2003-07-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi! Hi thanks for the interest of my programs ... i think you are the only one :-) not for long with your tempo! :) I want to explain a little history ... of topic .. sorry ... yes .. i pay my bills playing for the people, when i was young Neron was emperator of Rome ... i was make

[linux-audio-dev] Csound LGPL, was Re: [linux-audio-user] gmorgan-0.02

2003-07-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, torsdagen den 10 juli 2003 15.51 skrev du: On 2003.07.10 04:10, Robert Jonsson wrote: I guess you already know, but csound has changed license recently, but that was for the core parts only. I think the modules have their own licenses and it might not have rippled through just yet

Unix documentation, was: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Shared memory

2003-07-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, torsdagen den 17 juli 2003 12.09 skrev Juhana Sadeharju: From: Joost Yervante Damad [EMAIL PROTECTED] W. Richard Stevens's Unix Network Programming Volume 2, Interprocess Commumication contains samples for both SystemV and Posix shared memory routines. Great thanks all of you. I found

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-announce] gmorgan-0.06

2003-07-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
fredagen den 25 juli 2003 17.32 skrev Kjetil S. Matheussen: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Thierry MARX wrote: Sorry to tell you that... But try to tell us your progress only on major or semi major updates... There is no need to tell that you have understood how to make a Makefile : ). Post Only when

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-announce] gmorgan-0.06

2003-07-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
*hum*, I'd say he's closer to 0.6 and 0.06, or even 1.6 :) in my own ^^^ than

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Mx4

2003-08-02 Thread Robert Jonsson
Great Jens, Ouch! That was the wierdest interface today! I can't wait to try it :-). /Robert ps. it wasn't the wierdest a few days ago, I think that was the AudioPad ds. lördagen den 2 augusti 2003 09.40 skrev Jens M Andreasen: Hi all! There is now a new soft synth available at

[OT] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux 2.6 not a latency panacea?

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, I also found 2.6.0-test[123] to be less responsive than 2.4.x-ll, or even stock 2.4.x. I've also experienced XMMS dropouts under load (for example compiling Muse) Some behaviour I've noticed is that under heavy load the desktop/audio doesn't freeze for a certain block of time, but

Re: [linux-audio-dev] softsynth SDK

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, and of course it is also possible to directly write a LADSPA plugin and load that in one of .those softsynths. Does LADSPA support alsaseq MIDI input? They can, the softsynths that are internal to MusE work that way. /Robert

Re: [OT] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux 2.6 not a latency panacea?

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
Friday 15 August 2003 21:14 skrev Ingo Oeser: On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:02:21PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: [kernel scheduler tunables] i guess it would be relatively easy to replace the above with variables controlled via sysctl. It is. There is even a patch for that. Google for kernel

Re: [linux-audio-dev] softsynth SDK

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
måndag 18 augusti 2003 23:26 skrev nikodimka: Heh :) two different answers :) :) Well, I guess they are the same but from two different angles. MusE's softsynths could be discribed as the wrapper Steve mentions. They can, the softsynths that are internal to MusE work that way. ..

Re: [linux-audio-dev] KEYBOARDS: Linux is not suited for audio applications ...

2003-09-05 Thread Robert Jonsson
Friday 05 September 2003 12:16 skrev Stefan Nitschke: Hello, the german magazine KEYBOARDS has answered a readers question about audio and linux with tremendous ignorance. I think this is a good chance to push linux to the attention of the masses. Here is the full text of question and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] capturing code

2003-09-08 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, You could do worse than check here: http://linux-sound.org/ - especially under the Network Audio link. /Robert måndag 08 september 2003 13:43 skrev Ghaith Nasrawi: hello there, we are writing here a software that requires capturing code to stream live voice from one machine and play

[linux-audio-dev] Re: No spam replies please

2003-09-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
Tuesday 09 September 2003 10:56 skrev Frank Barknecht: Hallo, Brad Arant hat gesagt: // Brad Arant wrote: I wont tell anyone - I wont even tell them you can't spell. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [linux-audio-dev] YOUR SINCERE ATTENTION IS INDEED NEEDED.

Drums++ was: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Gungirl Sequencer 0.1

2003-09-15 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi Mario, Monday 15 September 2003 16:43 skrev Mario Lang: Great! Another linux audio tool inaccessible to the blind. I am feeling very very left out... Yeah, I know the situation. I'm not blind myself but I used to work in the disability industry. Providing, mainly, adaptations for

[linux-audio-dev] lowlatency test at linuxdevices

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, First I must admit right away, I only looked at the pretty pictures so far, but they where sufficiently nice for me to post it here ;-P. http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT7751365763.html /Robert

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sick of rebooting

2003-10-01 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi Hans, Wednesday 01 October 2003 01.39 skrev Hans Fugal: I'm hoping there's a simple solution to this that I've just missed somewhere along the line. Occasionally something will crash while using oss emulation and I can't use the sound card until I reboot. I've tried lsof /dev/dsp and as

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Athlon64

2003-10-15 Thread Robert Jonsson
onsdagen den 15 oktober 2003 19.25 skrev Takashi Iwai: At Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:21:34 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: I'm potentially in the market for a new box before end of year. Has anyone found anything to show whether Athlon64 (or the high-end FX line) are worth it for audio? Assume some

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Athlon64 .. performance boost ?

2003-10-16 Thread Robert Jonsson
Thursday 16 October 2003 12.36 skrev Benno Senoner: Robert Jonsson wrote: Since we are in a world where 64bit native is only a recompile away (tm)... Anyone have any insights on the possible performance improvements with that perspective? I've heard the Athlon64 has lots of registers

Getting [OT] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Athlon64 .. performance boost ?

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, PS2: I see a big problem with the schism of the 64bit instruction sets (between Intel Itanium and AMD64). Basically it puts Microsoft in an uncomfortable position: - increases the amount of development resources - incompatibilities between Itanium and AMD 64: if you bought MS Office

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fixed vs Floating point comparison.

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Ohh, this is very interesting... Thanks Juan for the code snippets! I did some short tests with extremely varying and surprising results. But... I got no time right now, will proceed with more tests tonight. As much as don't like it, I have to support the claim that integer is faster as of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Fixed vs Floating point comparison.

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
? Improvements? /Robert Friday 17 October 2003 09.55 skrev Robert Jonsson: Ohh, this is very interesting... Thanks Juan for the code snippets! I did some short tests with extremely varying and surprising results. But... I got no time right now, will proceed with more tests tonight. As much as don't

Re: [linux-audio-dev] ow!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, because thats a lot more work. doing stuff like this (once you have a pixmap based toolkit in place) is easy, easy, easy. devising new metaphors and analogies for the UI is tough, often like a research project. fair enough. and it looks like this is a clone of an actual piece of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] new linux audio hardware company

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, kjetil wrote this for VST. it works. its very cool. its a bit of a kludge. i reimplemented it to provide a JACK VST host (not released yet). to do it properly requires that WINE abandon its approach of providing its own incomplete pthreads implementation, either by completing it, or

Re: [linux-audio-dev] JACK tutorial

2003-10-20 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi James, Monday 20 October 2003 10.26 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I've recently been learning to use JACK, and I had a look around for some kind of introductory article. I couldn't find one, so I wrote the tutorial I would have wanted, as I learnt. Good stuff! The tutorial is

[linux-audio-dev] Performance utilities of the future.

2003-10-21 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, This seems like an interesting article, describeing a new kernel service/application in 2.6. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-oprof.html?ca=dnt-441 It's called OProfiler. OProfile can help you identify issues such as loop unrolling, poor cache utilization, inefficient

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Does NI run Traktor FS on Linux through Wine ?

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Jonsson
Tuesday 04 November 2003 11.38 skrev Florian Schirmer: Hi, May I forward this to the german Keyboards magazine? Just kidding. ;) Don't feed the trolls ;-) Let's wait until we have something which is more linux'ish to show... Aha! This suggests there IS something more linuxish coming? :)

[linux-audio-dev] [RFC] Request For Contest - The Linux-2.6 theme song contest !

2003-11-14 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi Everybody, This mail is a direct consequence of the song Austin Acton posted recently. :) A nice little tune made with linux, about linux, that has been quite successful with very little advertisement. After a few brain rotations (before you ask, yes, I think by rotating my brain) I came

Re: [linux-audio-dev] and just to finalize ...

2003-11-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
Tuesday 18 November 2003 15.22 skrev Paul Davis: I'd like to say: woohoo! i suppose that if i knew this was possible 2 years ago, i would never have written JACK. that's the upside, perhaps. should JACK exist? is the address space isolation worth it? big questions. As others have also

Re: [linux-audio-dev] oh no ... virtual vocalists ...

2003-11-20 Thread Robert Jonsson
Thursday 20 November 2003 05.09 skrev Paul Davis: http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2003/Vocaloid.html Oh yeah! Oh nooo! Oh... what? Can they do that? Isn't there some law or something... probably murphys law... - Will be very interesting to hear how a thing like that can sound.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] oh no ... virtual vocalists ...

2003-11-20 Thread Robert Jonsson
Actually there was a demo. http://www.zero-g.co.uk/index.cfm?articleid=802 Sounds very convincing in my crappy headphones... /Robert Thursday 20 November 2003 09.14 skrev Robert Jonsson: Thursday 20 November 2003 05.09 skrev Paul Davis: http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2003

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Singing speech synthesis test with festival

2003-11-26 Thread Robert Jonsson
Thursday 27 November 2003 07.24 skrev Juan Linietsky: Well, I really wondered after that thread on speech synthesis on how something done with festival would actually sound mixed up. I this experiment in nearly half an hour, so dont think it's something hard. I just wrote the voices in that

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [OT] linux audio on PPCi

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, Sunday 30 November 2003 19.00 skrev Christian Schoenebeck: Es geschah am Donnerstag, 27. November 2003 11:42 als [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I know some applications are not ported yet to ppc and suffer from x86-isms, but that should be fixable I guess :) It's not only orphaned asm

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [OT] linux audio on PPCi

2003-12-01 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, CK wrote: I read: I think this an urban myth, the Nvidia drivers may be proprietary but they are well functioning. I think this is a pretty rural comment, there is more than x86, where are the nvidia binaries for 2.6, and personally I really don't feel like loading a binary only module.

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Firewire, what's the story?

2003-12-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, tisdagen den 09 december 2003 12.22 skrev Steve Harris: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote: I seem to recall that it does, but that the packet size is smaller, making the latency problem easier to deal with. Isoch - 1394 has a timer operating on the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Firewire, what's the story?

2003-12-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
tisdagen den 09 december 2003 13.35 skrev Steve Harris: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:57:16 +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: I googled a little last night, some people we all know popped up here and there (Hi Steve, Mark and Bob). There was a LAD message from 2001, someone who had been in contact

Re: MID vs MOD - WAS : Re: [linux-audio-dev] .mid files playing in Linux games

2004-02-02 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, On Monday 02 February 2004 16.33, Dave Phillips wrote: Dominic Genest wrote: I compare MIDI to the WYMIWYG (what you MEAN is what you get), and MOD or other formats alike to WYSIWYG (what you SEE is what you get). I would say instead that MODs are WYHIWYG (what you HEAR is what you

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Looking for SF2 file format description ?

2004-02-05 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Thursday 05 February 2004 15.12, Dominic Genest wrote: Hello, Where could I find specifications of SF2 file format ? Others have pointed to descriptions of the format. I thought I'd ask what do you want it for? Possibly what you are trying to do is already available with current

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 01.32, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:50, Dave Griffiths wrote: jack works with intel830 DRI Hmm.. I only have Radeon's, so I'm a bit out of luck as far as testing other cards I guess. Anyone else have a positive/negative experience? (For

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 02.11, Paul Davis wrote: I guess I'll have to wait for the day when I can afford two multi-channel audio interfaces, two multi-channel MIDI interfaces, and a dedicated machine to handle the visualisation aspect of things. or ... you could just get a Matrox video

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 13.32, Vincent Touquet wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: its a basic problem with real time software, the POSIX API etc. JACK tries to lock *all* the process memory. This is to ensure that nothing gets swapped out, right ? Else it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

2004-02-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 14.07, Vincent Touquet wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote: I'm running quite happily with DRI enabled on my ATI card now, the problem was definitely that it was trying to lock too much memory. Ok. I assume that you have a Firegl

[linux-audio-dev] ms-windows sources

2004-02-14 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hilarious comment from slashdot about this debacle, there's a lot of truth there though, if you happen to come across it, don't touch it. /Robert Gandalf: No! Don't ever use it! Frodo: How do we know it's source to the One OS of the Dark Lord? Gandalf tosses a CD-R into the burner,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Interesting MIDI project

2004-02-21 Thread Robert Jonsson
lördagen den 21 februari 2004 00.47 skrev Fred Gleason: On Thursday 19 February 2004 23:27, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: http://www.nbb.cornell.edu/neurobio/land/STUDENTPROJ/2002to2003/lil2/ Speechless /R Now, who says fuzzy logic has no place in audio programming? ducking Cheers!

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Freeze?

2004-02-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 20.25, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: Hello. Recently Logic 6's Freeze feature was mentioned here, and Freeze is mentioned in a new interview at Emagic's webpage: Q: Any other favorite feature in Logic 6, that you use most? Boris Blank [of Yello]: I think Freeze

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Freeze?

2004-02-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
Me guesses you are referring to this:[http://www.eca.cx/lad/2001/Nov/0310.html] message I posted back then. I'd have to say that they where probably not influenced by that Oh, skipping through the entire thread, the post by Nelson Posse Lago comes scaringly close to describing freeze.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Freeze?

2004-02-25 Thread Robert Jonsson
onsdagen den 25 februari 2004 23.00 skrev Paul Davis: I still think about this from time to time and I would really like to see a REAL implementation of the proposal. :-) ardour basically allows this already, although it is not automatic. there is no way to know what the user wants, so we

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Freeze?

2004-02-26 Thread Robert Jonsson
torsdagen den 26 februari 2004 17.54 skrev Benjamin Flaming: ... and Tinara is what I want ;) I want that too, are you a mind reader? :-o A bit more seriously, offline rendering in a tree graph works for 3d editing, and has worked for a number of years. I think it's a natural progression

[linux-audio-dev] Evolutionary Development, was: [ANN] First public release of Lindrum v 0.5.1

2004-03-01 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, I looked into hydrogen code. To learn. I looked into lot of little projects code. Dead projects. To learn. And IMHO they're not useless. Maybe my project will be dead at the end of the year. But then i made my experience and still can join hydrogen or other projects. I agree with you

Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff)

2004-03-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 12.05, Steve Harris wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:36:42 +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote: Uhmm .. So where do I find the midistream? You dont, LADSPA doesnt do MIDI. If it's a softsynth you are making I think Jack would be the way to go. Then the synth could be

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA extension - Formal proposal.

2004-03-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 15.34, Alfons Adriaensen wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:30:23PM +, Steve Harris wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:22:33 +0100, Alfons Adriaensen wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 01:57:21PM +, Steve Harris wrote: There is a formal approval mecahnism,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Anyone planned a GTK2-based Multitracker?

2004-04-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, ... (Random thought) A MIDI sequencer where you can draw control curves over the tracks (like ardour volume and whatnot) would be very cool.. esp. for electronic music (like, say, trance) when the control parameters are as important as the notes themselves Both MusE and

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Anyone planned a GTK2-based Multitracker?

2004-04-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
lördagen den 10 april 2004 18.53 skrev Dave Robillard: On 04/10/04 04:22:49, Robert Jonsson wrote: Hi, ... Oh, then I must ask what the feature should do more explicitly? To my ears the controller editor in MusE does exactly what you are asking for. Sorry, I wasn't really expecting

Re: MIDI-only sequencer, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux soundapps pages updated

2004-04-12 Thread Robert Jonsson
måndagen den 12 april 2004 14.47 skrev Dave Phillips: Greetings: I've run Master Tracks Pro under Xsteem, the MIDI I/O was fine. Ditto for Sequencer Plus Gold under DOSemu. These programs are quite advanced as MIDI-only sequencers, and I agree that much could be learned from them. However,

Re: MIDI-only sequencer, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux soundapps pages updated

2004-04-13 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 02.08, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: Jens M Andreasen wrote: Robert! Could you please repost in html table format? It is hard to follow your line of thought. At least to me it looks like all your columns are scrambled? for the record, html posts will be eaten by

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio over Ethernet?

2004-04-14 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, On Wednesday 14 April 2004 09.47, Anders Torger wrote: On Tuesday 13 April 2004 19.17, Anders Torger wrote: Is there any work done for transporting digital audio over ethernet? For example a library, an open standard or something? /Anders Torger Thanks for the replies. However, I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] MuSE 0.9 codename COTURNIX - out now with documented API!

2004-04-19 Thread Robert Jonsson
måndagen den 19 april 2004 07.03 skrev Juan Linietsky: On Sunday 18 April 2004 08:19, jaromil wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 re all, i forward you here the announce as somebody could be interested also in exploring the doxyfied MuSE API, which is getting

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Anyone planned a GTK2-based Multitracker?

2004-04-19 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi again, revisiting an old thread. ... It would be nice as you could see your entire piece from the main window, and see where things evolve, how control changes relate to each other, etc. The one (significantly more simple) feature I'd like to see in the MusE control editor is a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kernel 2.6.6 just out

2004-05-12 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 10.25, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On mån, 2004-05-10 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good question. I had already read that and was curious myself. Also, how about 2.6.6-mm1? I want to upgrade to Fedora Core 2 and a new kernel so I can quit pissing off Paul D.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] kernel 2.6.6 just out

2004-05-13 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, ... On my SuSE 9.0 system, this makes a *great* difference. Yes, I can attest to that too now. Many thanks for the various tips - the lowest period size I can obtain now with jackstart and --realtime in duplex with the SBLive is now 512 (which is OK) 512 is the smallest buffer size

[linux-audio-dev] kernel 2.6.6 just out

2004-05-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning latency: ;) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Takashi did some nice latency testing of the current kernel

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: FreeVSTi Compatibility List / VSTserver FST

2004-04-28 Thread Robert Jonsson
Great job Christian! Oh, now I want to try them myself :)!! /Robert On Wednesday 28 April 2004 12.53, Christian Frisson wrote: Hi all, Dave Robillard wrote: What the heck is the point of it being free if you want to have your word on all mods? Sounds pretty un-free to me. Maybe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: Disposable Soft Synth Interface

2004-04-29 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, (cross posting to muse devel) On Thursday 29 April 2004 11.50, Tim Goetze wrote: [Chris Cannam] The header file is here: http://dssi.sourceforge.net/dssi.h.txt the header looks OK to me, reusing ALSA and LADSPA is a nice idea indeed. however i'm a bit uneasy about the configure()

Re: [linux-audio-dev] (web-based) interactive sound art?

2004-05-04 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 12.41, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Francois Dechelle hat gesagt: // Francois Dechelle wrote: Yep, I agree. What annoyes me in Pall Thayer's work (http://www.this.is/pallit/) that you mentionned in your previous mail is the fact that it relies on proprietary

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Live CD (Audio)

2004-05-27 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Thursday 27 May 2004 15.46, Paul Davis wrote: Hi, forgive me if this question has been asked before: Is there something like a Linux Live CD optimized for and containing audio (editing) applications? Something like this http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php where I can

Re: [linux-audio-dev] JACK/ALSA cannot set capture period lower than 512 with SBLive

2004-06-07 Thread Robert Jonsson
måndagen den 7 juni 2004 23.02 skrev Lee Revell: Hey, It seems to be a known issue that you cannot run JACK with the capture period size lower than 512 with the SBLive ALSA driver. See this thread: http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2003-December/003764.h tml and this:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?

2004-06-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 08.53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:53:43PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Steve Harris hat gesagt: // Steve Harris wrote: What I meant with nice is more in the vein of this here:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?

2004-06-09 Thread Robert Jonsson
if i try out a new VST plug i open its GUI. with the GUI i get a nice and compact look of all its controls. If i want to use the plugin i resort to rebuilding the GUI with galan controls (they have better functionality). its all there and its your choice. but there are of course several

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Knobs / widget design

2004-06-10 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Thursday 10 June 2004 02.53, Tim Hockin wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 08:39:15PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: But then you either have to click and drag up, click and drag up, click and drag up and so on because the motion is too slow, or you can't make no, I click and hold as long as I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] TiMidity as a CPU hog

2004-06-11 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi, On Friday 11 June 2004 11.26, Jens M Andreasen wrote: Hi Dave, Takashi! I've got timidity up and running now, as a server under OSS. Made me self a new option to read directly from /dev/sequencer2 (The documentation says the input format should be similar to /dev/sequencer, but that's

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] MusE 0.7.0 is out!

2004-07-18 Thread Robert Jonsson
Hi everybody, It is finally here! The long awaited: drumroll # # ### ## ## ## ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # ## ## #

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [ladcca] lash directions

2004-08-04 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 20.05, Steve Harris wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 06:34:32 +0100, Bob Ham wrote: The properties that I had been working on have become gobjects and what was to be a new networking system is a seperate, gobject-based library to provide a high-level networking api

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Hello - FYI - intro

2004-08-24 Thread Robert Jonsson
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 13.50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your support and I will give Gentoo a shot.. Hi Mark, I have to disagree with this advice. Though gentoo will give you immense insight into how things work and it's probably unparallelled performance I would not consider it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] OSC vs MIDI

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Jonsson
Getting off topic here, but there's a little more to it than that. 1 Syntactic sugared implementation is much much more preferable to 101 conventions for doing OOP with void pointers. Things like typesafety, getting rid of macros in favour of inline functions. The STL is another real reason

  1   2   >