On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:49:37AM -0400, Pete Bessman wrote:
One more point in favor of GThread I just figured out is config
testing for it. All you have to do is at a pkg-config check for
gthread-2.0 and your set. Having glanced through other programs,
checking for pthreads seems a bit
At 12 Jun 2004 00:09:05 -0500,
Jack O'Quin wrote:
Pete Bessman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One more point in favor of GThread I just figured out is config
testing for it. All you have to do is at a pkg-config check for
gthread-2.0 and your set. Having glanced through other programs,
Another advantage if you're new to it as I am, is that there are some very
good books on pthreads. And you can look at the Ardour and Softwerk code. ; )
The O'Reilly book is old ( '96 ) but very clearly written and readable. Of
course because it's old you can probably find it at the library.
Does anybody have any opinion on which threading system is superior?
I've been using glib for a lot of things, but for whatever reason I'm
hesitant about using it for threading if the only benefit it will
provide is consistency (I'm guessing it's just a wrapper for pthread
anyway).
[pb]
Does anybody have any opinion on which threading system is superior?
I've been using glib for a lot of things, but for whatever reason I'm
hesitant about using it for threading if the only benefit it will
provide is consistency (I'm guessing it's just a wrapper for pthread
anyway).
yes, its just
At Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:10:17 -0400,
Paul Davis wrote:
Does anybody have any opinion on which threading system is superior?
I've been using glib for a lot of things, but for whatever reason I'm
hesitant about using it for threading if the only benefit it will
provide is consistency (I'm
Pete Bessman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One more point in favor of GThread I just figured out is config
testing for it. All you have to do is at a pkg-config check for
gthread-2.0 and your set. Having glanced through other programs,
checking for pthreads seems a bit more involved than I care
