At Wed, 12 May 2004 15:22:06 +0200,
Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Jens M Andreasen hat gesagt: // Jens M Andreasen wrote:
To reiterate the question: SuSE 9.0 or Mandrake 10.0?
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for
Richard Bown wrote:
Try a make mrproper
What does that do?
The command make mrproper insures that you have a pristine source
tree. (whatever that means ...)
See http://www.google.com/search?q=make+mrproper :)
--
Dr. Albert Graf
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 21:54, Albert Graef wrote:
[SuSE 9.0 and capabilities]
That sounds like you're sources are still misconfigured.
I was just being a doofus. I hadn't made clean after make dep.
So the simple steps to getting it working were: make cloneconfig;
make dep; make clean; make
Hi,
...
On my SuSE 9.0 system, this makes a *great* difference.
Yes, I can attest to that too now. Many thanks for the various
tips - the lowest period size I can obtain now with jackstart and
--realtime in duplex with the SBLive is now 512 (which is OK)
512 is the smallest buffer size
On mån, 2004-05-10 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question. I had already read that and was curious myself. Also, how about
2.6.6-mm1? I want to upgrade to Fedora Core 2 and a new kernel so I can quit
pissing off Paul D. and the guys with my 2.96 gcc ;-)
On a related question: I
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 10.25, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On mån, 2004-05-10 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question. I had already read that and was curious myself. Also,
how about 2.6.6-mm1? I want to upgrade to Fedora Core 2 and a new kernel
so I can quit pissing off Paul D.
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
A point list of bad things:
- For audio work the bundled 2.6 kernel is not good enough.
This depends on the kind of audio work you do. I can do all I want
reliably with 2.6 since I installed 2.6.3 the first time. I don't
record 12
On ons, 2004-05-12 at 11:04, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
A point list of bad things:
- For audio work the bundled 2.6 kernel is not good enough.
This depends on the kind of audio work you do. I can do all I want
reliably with 2.6
Hallo,
Jens M Andreasen hat gesagt: // Jens M Andreasen wrote:
To clearify: I use my linuxbox almost exclusively as a realtime
midi-synthesizer. The occasional hick-up is not a problem, or at least
it is no worse than the audience stepping with high heels and
vacuumcleaners into my patchwork
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Jens M Andreasen hat gesagt: // Jens M Andreasen wrote:
To reiterate the question: SuSE 9.0 or Mandrake 10.0?
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for about six months now,
and it performs very well for audio work. SuSE
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 14:22, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for about six months now,
and it performs very well for audio work.
Are you using the stock 2.4.21 kernel? Any idea how to enable capabilities on it?
I've been playing around with SuSE 9.0 over
Richard Bown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you using the stock 2.4.21 kernel? Any idea how to enable
capabilities on it? I've been playing around with SuSE 9.0 over the
last couple of days and with an SBLive am only get reasonably
xrun-free performance with jackd at 2048, 2 periods. I'd
Hallo,
Richard Bown hat gesagt: // Richard Bown wrote:
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 14:22, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for about six months
now, and it performs very well for audio work.
Are you using the stock 2.4.21 kernel? Any idea how to enable
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 15:02, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Then, you have to build a working kernel.
Alfons gave me the inside line on that off-list:
On SuSE, you need to do a 'make cloneconfig' before the 'make menuconfig'
and all the rest. This is easily forgotten, usually giving you a kernel
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Jens M Andreasen hat gesagt: // Jens M Andreasen wrote:
To reiterate the question: SuSE 9.0 or Mandrake 10.0?
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for about six months now,
and it performs very well for audio work.
Richard Bown wrote:
On SuSE, you need to do a 'make cloneconfig' before the 'make menuconfig'
and all the rest. This is easily forgotten, usually giving you a kernel
that doesn't work.
Something I didn't know. However it didn't do the trick quite yet as the resulting
kernel was still borked.
iain duncan wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Jens M Andreasen hat gesagt: // Jens M Andreasen wrote:
To reiterate the question: SuSE 9.0 or Mandrake 10.0?
I've been using a standard SuSE 9.0 (2.4) for about six months now,
and it
Hi,
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takashi did some nice latency testing of the current kernel
Good question. I had already read that and was curious myself. Also, how about
2.6.6-mm1? I want to upgrade to Fedora Core 2 and a new kernel so I can quit
pissing off Paul D. and the guys with my 2.96 gcc ;-)
Jan
On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:50 , Robert Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Hi,
As a
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takashi
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:44:27PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Robert Jonsson hat gesagt: // Robert Jonsson wrote:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] Add mpage_writepages() scheduling point
At 12:50 AM 11/05/2004, Robert Jonsson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] ia32: 4Kb stacks (and irqstacks) patch
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is a patch to enable 4Kb stacks for x86. The goal of this is to
1) Reduce footprint per thread so that
Robert Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a service to all readers, here's an excerpt of the Changelog concerning
latency: ;)
[...]
So... humbly asking, is it time yet to make the switch? :-)
Maybe. If you do and you're using the realtime LSM, you're going to
need the latest (beta)
23 matches
Mail list logo
