On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Paul Winkler wrote:
Hi folks, your friendly temporary list-admin here.
(Joern's on vacation and I'm filling in.)
chiming in from my vacation (i'm currently in thorshfn, north
iceland wih a friend and she lets me use her machine :)
the only reason lad has been open was to
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 08:12 AM, Paul Winkler wrote:
I'd like to take an informal poll:
Should the LAD list remain totally open, or should
non-member postings require moderator approval?
moderator approval would be good
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:09:24 -0400
Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more bit of information... I'm not sure if everybody knows that
there was a good reason the list policy was set to open.
*please follow up to the other thread*, this is just an aside...
From
What? And give up the chance to make 33% commission helping some
foreigner move an account their father/uncle/husband/sister left
unavailable to them
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Winkler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:13 AM
To: [EMAIL
Robert Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is some crossposting occuring that, atleast sometimes, is
worth while. If the list is closed this won't be possible if not all
senders are members of all the mailinglists, and that is hardly the
purpose.
This actually works fairly well already
Jack O'Quin wrote:
... I would vote++ for the suggestion to moderate non-member postings.
Agreed.
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:55:41PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Without saying my opinion (which is ambivalent, because I use
spamassassin and often don't see the spam coming through)
I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but I'm going to
look into getting SpamAssasin in the pipe
One more bit of information... I'm not sure if everybody knows that
there was a good reason the list policy was set to open.
*please follow up to the other thread*, this is just an aside...
From http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/subscribelad.php3:
The list is open.
You can post messages even
On Thursday 14 August 2003 17:25, ljp wrote:
On Thursday 14 August 2003 17:12, Paul Winkler wrote:
Hi folks, your friendly temporary list-admin here.
(Joern's on vacation and I'm filling in.)
We seem to be getting quite a lot of spam lately.
Currently the list is open - non-members can
At 05:12 PM 14/08/2003, Paul Winkler wrote:
We seem to be getting quite a lot of spam lately.
Currently the list is open - non-members can post.
I'd like to take an informal poll:
Should the LAD list remain totally open, or should
non-member postings require moderator approval?
I should point
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:12:55AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
Should the LAD list remain totally open, or should
non-member postings require moderator approval?
Given the amount of spam we're having the last days, I'd
say the list should be moderated for non-members, and for
new members
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:57:12PM +0200, ?rjan Askhult wrote:
Hi,
When this was discussed on lmkl the answer from Matti Aarnio -- co-postmaster of
vger.kernel.org was:
Running lists _closed_ doesn't solve the thing either. It would
be enough for a spammer to fake source address that
Hallo,
Paul Winkler hat gesagt: // Paul Winkler wrote:
One more bit of information... I'm not sure if everybody knows that
there was a good reason the list policy was set to open.
[...]
Without saying my opinion (which is ambivalent, because I use
spamassassin and often don't see the spam
On Thursday 14 August 2003 17:12, Paul Winkler wrote:
Hi folks, your friendly temporary list-admin here.
(Joern's on vacation and I'm filling in.)
We seem to be getting quite a lot of spam lately.
Currently the list is open - non-members can post.
I'd like to take an informal poll:
14 matches
Mail list logo
