On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using btrfs as rootfs on my Fedora 12 (rawhide) test system.
Every yum activity is very slow, like 15 minutes for installation of 11
packages 25MB in
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using btrfs as rootfs on my Fedora 12 (rawhide) test system.
Every yum activity is
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 04:46:20PM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
Hi!
Out of curiosity for btrfs, I'm modifying a project of mine
(http://blitiri.com.ar/p/libjio) to use the clone range ioctl, and I've got a
couple of questions. I thought this would be the place to ask them, I hope you
Hello everyone,
A quick note that Josef's ENOSPC work is now integrated in the master
branch of the btrfs-unstable repo. There is still a small window in his
accounting where ENOSPC oopsen can creep in, but the code is doing very
well here and the worst case estimates he uses are conservative
Fix leak of vfsmount write reference and open_ioctl_trans reference on
ENOMEM. Clean up the error paths while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 41 ++---
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff
If an ioctl-initiated transaction is open, we can't force a commit during
the free space checks in order to free up pinned extents or else we
deadlock. Just ENOSPC instead.
A more satisfying solution that reserves space for the entire user
transaction up front is forthcoming...
Signed-off-by:
