Re: UI issues around RAID1

2009-11-17 Thread jim owens
Andrey Kuzmin wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jim owens jow...@hp.com wrote: But as we have said many times... if we have different raid types active on different files, any attempt to make Late question, but could you please explain it a bit further (or point me to respective

RFC: Btrfs snapshots feature proposal for Fedora 13

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, I've written up a draft of an Fedora 13 feature proposal for filesystem rollback using Btrfs snapshots that are automatically created by yum: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWithBtrfs It'd be great to get feedback on whether this is a good idea, and how the UI

Re: RFC: Btrfs snapshots feature proposal for Fedora 13

2009-11-17 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, I've written up a draft of an Fedora 13 feature proposal for filesystem rollback using Btrfs snapshots that are automatically created by yum: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWithBtrfs It'd be great to get

Re: UI issues around RAID1

2009-11-17 Thread Andrey Kuzmin
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, jim owens jow...@hp.com wrote: snip So we know the raw free blocks, but can not guarantee how many raw blocks per new user write-block will be consumed because we do not know what topology will be in effect for a new write. We could cheat and use worst-case

Somewhat borked filesystem in need of fixing

2009-11-17 Thread Nuutti Kotivuori
Hello, I recently told here about a broken filesystem after btrfs-convert friends and I was informed that this was a known bug and fixed in later releases. I should've reformatted the partition and copied in the files anew, but I didn't, since this isn't a crucial production system for me. So,

Re: Somewhat borked filesystem in need of fixing

2009-11-17 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Nuutti Kotivuori na...@iki.fi wrote: Hello, I recently told here about a broken filesystem after btrfs-convert friends and I was informed that this was a known bug and fixed in later releases. I should've reformatted the partition and copied in the files

Re: [PATCH] Snapshot/subvolume listing feature

2009-11-17 Thread TARUISI Hiroaki
Patches for Snapshot/subvolume listing feature are modified. With these patches, ioctl searches for subvolumes under only one tree, and btrfsctl repeatedly creates parameters and calls ioctl until all subvolumes are listed. An intrenal logic was changed but user interfaces (option and contents

[PATCH] Subvolume listing feature for ioctl.

2009-11-17 Thread TARUISI Hiroaki
New feature to list up subvolume/snapshots under specified tree of file is introduced to ioctl. Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki taruishi.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 283 +++ fs/btrfs/ioctl.h | 29 + 2 files changed, 312

[PATCH] Subvolume listing feature for btrfsctl.

2009-11-17 Thread TARUISI Hiroaki
New feature to list up subvolume/snapshots under specified tree of file is introduced to btrfsctl. This patch should apply with corresponding patch for kernel. Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki taruishi.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com --- btrfsctl.c | 191