Re: raid modes, balancing, and order in which data gets written

2010-07-16 Thread Mathijs Kwik
Ok, cool. Thanks for clearing that up. on-the-fly changing of raid-level sounds very useful. So, the way you describe it, it should also (eventually) be possible to change the raid-level on a per-file or per-directory basis? It might be quite useful to have the majority of data on raid5/raid10

Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS?  Like ...  Is it usable yet, and stuff like that? Thank you... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote: Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS?  Like ...  Is it usable yet, and stuff like that? Thank you... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message

RE: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:g...@overclocked.net] On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote: Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is it usable yet, and stuff like that? It has been in a good state for quite a

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:14:49AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:g...@overclocked.net] On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote: Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is it usable

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
On 16 July 2010 14:16, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:14:49AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:g...@overclocked.net] On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote: Is this a good place to get

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
Yes, Fedora is one of the releases that has officially supported it for a while now. Additionally an initrd hook for btrfs has just been implemented for Arch Linux, so you might see btrfs being an option for that in the next version of the installer :-) I also believe that Ubuntu 10.10 is

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353

2010-07-16 Thread Johannes Hirte
Am Donnerstag 15 Juli 2010, 20:14:51 schrieb Johannes Hirte: Am Donnerstag 15 Juli 2010, 02:11:04 schrieb Dave Chinner: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Donnerstag 08 Juli 2010, 16:31:09 schrieb Chris Mason: I'm not sure if btrfs is to blame for this

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:55:26AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS?  Like ...  Is it usable yet, and stuff like that? Use it if you don't care about the data on your box or do regular backups. All of us developers run it on our

Re: Status of BTRFS

2010-07-16 Thread Johannes Hirte
Am Freitag 16 Juli 2010, 13:55:26 schrieb Edward Ned Harvey: Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is it usable yet, and stuff like that? Thank you... I wouldn't suggest to use it in productive environments. Especially as the error handling is very

Re: csum errors

2010-07-16 Thread Brian Rogers
On 07/15/2010 12:35 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:32:12PM +0200, Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Donnerstag 15 Juli 2010, 21:03:09 schrieb Chris Mason: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:30:17PM +0200, Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Dienstag 13 Juli 2010, 14:23:58 schrieb