On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small
files
into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk
is
not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64.
It seems like you really want to use
On 11/03/2011 02:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small
files
into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk
is
not full under kenerl 3.0
On 03.11.2011 02:41, Li Zefan wrote:
(as this is going to be merged into mainline..)
+/*
+ * calls iterate() for every inode that references the extent identified by
+ * the given parameters. will use the path given as a parameter and return
it
+ * released.
+ * when the iterator
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:25:23AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
In integration-scrub branch, following warning messages were displayed by
running xfstests.
# btrfs fi sh /dev/sdd4
Label: none uuid: 8f28d85c-e37c-4c1b-adef-2627ca59be78
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 31.49MB
(2011/11/03 20:19), Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:25:23AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
In integration-scrub branch, following warning messages were displayed by
running xfstests.
# btrfs fi sh /dev/sdd4
Label: none uuid: 8f28d85c-e37c-4c1b-adef-2627ca59be78
Total
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:02:31AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
This one happened again, exactly same sequence of warnings and the crash
at the end (same stack traces). It was in integration-scrub branch, ie.
with all
Hello,
I'm currently running Linux 3.0.7 (release -1 under Arch 64bit) and
btrfs-progs-unstable 0.19.20101006-1, I'm trying to resize my btrfs
filesystem on /dev/sdb6, the partition has the room to allow expansion
here's the output of btrfs fi sh:
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid:
