On 21.01.2012 11:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
When I do btrfs scrub start / the machine locks immediately up hard.
Can you please give me the output of sysrq-w when the machine is locked up?
Thanks,
Arne
Then usually on next
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012 schrieb Arne Jansen:
On 21.01.2012 11:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
When I do btrfs scrub start / the machine locks immediately up hard.
Can you please give me the output of sysrq-w when the machine
On 24.01.2012 11:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012 schrieb Arne Jansen:
On 21.01.2012 11:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
When I do btrfs scrub start / the machine locks immediately up hard.
Can you please give
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012 schrieb Arne Jansen:
On 24.01.2012 11:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012 schrieb Arne Jansen:
On 21.01.2012 11:49, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
When I do btrfs scrub start / the
On 01/20/2012 09:54 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/19/2012 05:24 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
With the most current
If we span a long area in a bitmap we could end up taking a lot of time
searching to the next free area if we're searching from the original
window_start, so advance window_start in order to make sure we don't do any
superficial searching. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
---
evergreen writes:
Although there is LessFS's Mark Ruijter :
http://www.lessfs.com/wordpress/?p=684cpage=1#comment-3114
On average the speeds appear to be 48% faster then snappy.
Sounds promising...
--
Well, it seems that the performance is really good.
Apparently, LZ4 has displaced
On Thursday 01 December 2011 09:55:27 Arne Jansen wrote:
As RAID0 is already not a strict 'all disks or none', I like the idea to
have it even more dynamic to reach full optimization. But I'd like to see
some properties conserved:
a) In case of even size disks, the stripes should always be
There have been 4 warnings on 32-bit build, they are herewith fixed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de
---
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
Hi
I tried the branch on one of my ceph osd, and there is a big difference
in the performance.
The average request size stayed high, but after around a hour the kernel
crashed.
IOstat
http://pastebin.com/xjuriJ6J
Kernel trace
http://pastebin.com/SYE95GgH
-martin
Am 23.01.2012 19:50,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:15:58PM +0100, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi
I tried the branch on one of my ceph osd, and there is a big
difference in the performance.
The average request size stayed high, but after around a hour the
kernel crashed.
IOstat
http://pastebin.com/xjuriJ6J
Kernel
Hi Chris,
great to hear that, could you give me a ping if you fixed it, than I can
retry it?
-martin
Am 24.01.2012 20:40, schrieb Chris Mason:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:15:58PM +0100, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi
I tried the branch on one of my ceph osd, and there is a big
difference in the
On Thursday 01 December 2011 09:55:27 Arne Jansen wrote:
As RAID0 is already not a strict 'all disks or none', I like the idea to
have it even more dynamic to reach full optimization. But I'd like to see
some properties conserved:
a) In case of even size disks, the stripes should always be
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:19:40PM +0100, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared a small package that updates the LZO version in the Linux
kernel to LZO v2.06.
I ran benchmarks on the new miniLZO and LZ4 on 64bit. LZ4 is generally slower
than snappy/lzo in the micro benchmarks.
The wiki on kernel.org is in read-only mode
[1] http://btrfs.ipv5.de/
Is wiki still in read only mode? I am able to login,
but there isn't any link to create new page ?
thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2012 09:54 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/19/2012 05:24 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at
On 25.01.2012 03:37, Anand Jain wrote:
The wiki on kernel.org is in read-only mode
[1] http://btrfs.ipv5.de/
Is wiki still in read only mode? I am able to login,
but there isn't any link to create new page ?
You mean the wiki mentioned above? You have to confirm
your email address to
17 matches
Mail list logo
