* Pavel Machek (pa...@suse.cz) wrote:
On Tue 2009-01-20 18:34:55, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
* Dave Chinner (da...@fromorbit.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
* Dave Chinner (da...@fromorbit.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100
* Dave Chinner (da...@fromorbit.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
* Pavel Machek (pa...@suse.cz) wrote:
Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
production' and should survive it...
I regularly (once or twice a week
Hi,
* Pavel Machek (pa...@suse.cz) wrote:
On Tue 2009-01-13 15:43:07, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
* Chris Mason (chris.ma...@oracle.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
Hi,
when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get
Hi,
when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the
following warning and bug message. The image can be found here
www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2
[ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a 6devid
2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0
[ 297.411937]
* Chris Mason (chris.ma...@oracle.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
Hi,
when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the
following warning and bug message. The image can be found here
www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2