Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

"Huang, Ying" writes: > Josef Bacik writes: > >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:55:23PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >>> "Huang, Ying" writes: >>> >>> > Hi, Chris, >>> > >>> > Chris Mason writes: >

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Josef Bacik writes: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:55:23PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> > Hi, Chris, >> > >> > Chris Mason writes: >> > >> >> On 19 Jun 2018, at 23:51, Huang,

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

"Huang, Ying" writes: > Hi, Chris, > > Chris Mason writes: > >> On 19 Jun 2018, at 23:51, Huang, Ying wrote: >>>>> "Huang, Ying" writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Josef, >>>>>> >>>>&g

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Hi, Chris, Chris Mason writes: > On 19 Jun 2018, at 23:51, Huang, Ying wrote: >>>> "Huang, Ying" writes: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Josef, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have time to take a look at the regression? >>>>&

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Chris Mason writes: > On 19 Jun 2018, at 23:51, Huang, Ying wrote: >>>> "Huang, Ying" writes: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Josef, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have time to take a look at the regression? >>>>> >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Ping * 3 "Huang, Ying" writes: > Ping again ... > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> Ping... >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >>> Hi, Josef, >>> >>> Do you have time to take a look at the regression? >&g

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Ping again ... "Huang, Ying" writes: > Ping... > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> Hi, Josef, >> >> Do you have time to take a look at the regression? >> >> kernel test robot writes: >> >>> Greeting, >>> >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

Ping... "Huang, Ying" writes: > Hi, Josef, > > Do you have time to take a look at the regression? > > kernel test robot writes: > >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -12.3% regression of blogbench.write_score and a +9.6% >>

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm] 9092c71bb7: blogbench.write_score -12.3% regression

lltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_dentry.btrfs_lookup.path_openat.do_filp_open.do_sys_open 13.90+8.3 22.20 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.path_openat.do_filp_open.do_sys_open.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath 13.91+8.3 22.22 perf-profile.ca

Re: [PATCH 2/9] uuid: use random32_get_bytes()

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 00:48 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:49:58AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: The uuid_le/be_gen() in lib/uuid.c has set UUID variants to be DCE, that is done in __uuid_gen_common() with b[8] = (b[8] 0x3F) | 0x80. Oh, I see, I missed that. To deal

Re: [PATCH 2/9] uuid: use random32_get_bytes()

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 22:38 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:35:37AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: The intention of lib/uuid.c is to unify various UUID related code, and put them in same place. In addition to UUID generation, it provide some other utility and may

Re: [PATCH 2/9] uuid: use random32_get_bytes()

) uses as well. uuid_be complies RFC4122, it uses internet byte order. But EFI uses little endian. Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org