On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:41:13PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
On Miércoles, 5 de Enero de 2011 18:42:42 Gordan Bobic escribió:
So by doing the hash indexing offline, the total amount of disk I/O
required effectively doubles, and the amount of CPU spent on doing the
hashing is in no way
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 12:24:18PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,
Trying to put together a list of TODO items for btrfs so we can update the
wiki
page fully. So far these things are on the list
* Proper ENOSPC handling
* O_DIRECT support (without checksumming)
* AIO support
*
I lost the original post so I'm jumping in at the wrong thread-point :)
Someone mentioned that the primary usage of de-dup is in the backup
realm. True perhaps currently, but de-dup IMO is *the* killer app in
the world of virtualization and is a huge reason why we're picking
NetApp at work to
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:57:54PM -0800, Tracy Reed wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:42:16PM +, Oliver Mattos spake thusly:
I'm considering writing that script to test on my ext3 disk just to see
how much duplicate wasted data I really have.
Check out the fdupes command. In Fedora 8
