On 03/29/2011 09:16 AM, liubo wrote:
On 03/28/2011 08:59 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Chris Mason's message of 2011-03-26 08:12:04 -0400:
Excerpts from liubo's message of 2011-03-24 07:18:59 -0400:
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly
helpful for
Please ignore this patch...
I just found we'd better revise the tracepoint side instead of btrfs side, will
dig it more.
thanks,
liubo
From: Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warnings of btrfs tracepoint on 32bit box
include/trace/events/btrfs.h:47:1: warning:
On 03/28/2011 08:59 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Chris Mason's message of 2011-03-26 08:12:04 -0400:
Excerpts from liubo's message of 2011-03-24 07:18:59 -0400:
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly
helpful for debugging, e.g
This is really neat, I've
Excerpts from liubo's message of 2011-03-24 07:18:59 -0400:
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly
helpful for debugging, e.g
This is really neat, I've queued it up.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly
helpful for debugging, e.g
dd-7822 [000] 2121.641088: btrfs_inode_request: root =
5(FS_TREE), gen = 4, ino = 256, blocks = 8, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 8,
logged_trans = 0
dd-7822 [000]
