On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:12:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Reading the quota tree root may fail with ENOENT
if there is no quota, which is fine, but the code was
ignoring every other error as well, which is not fine.
Kinda makes you want to write a test that would have caught this.
Kinda.
On 8/4/14, 1:35 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:12:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Reading the quota tree root may fail with ENOENT
if there is no quota, which is fine, but the code was
ignoring every other error as well, which is not fine.
Kinda makes you want to write a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:42:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/4/14, 1:35 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:12:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Reading the quota tree root may fail with ENOENT
if there is no quota, which is fine, but the code was
ignoring every other
On 8/4/14, 1:51 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:42:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/4/14, 1:35 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:12:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Reading the quota tree root may fail with ENOENT
if there is no quota, which is fine, but the
Reading the quota tree root may fail with ENOENT
if there is no quota, which is fine, but the code was
ignoring every other error as well, which is not fine.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
