On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 08:44:56AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The 'fi usage' is supposed to give the user-friendly overview, but the
patchset is stuck because I found the numbers wrong or misleading under
some circumstances.
Although these patchset may not be merged, I'm curious about the wrong
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:52:26PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:38:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
'btrfs fi df' command is currently able to be executed on any file/dir
inside btrfs since it uses btrfs ioctl to get disk usage info.
However it is somewhat confusing for
On 7/4/14, 8:52 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:38:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
'btrfs fi df' command is currently able to be executed on any file/dir
inside btrfs since it uses btrfs ioctl to get disk usage info.
However it is somewhat confusing for some end users since
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: Add mount point check for 'btrfs
fi df' command
From: Vikram Goyal vikigo...@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2014年07月07日 17:51
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:52:26PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: Add mount point check for 'btrfs
fi df' command
From: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2014年07月04日 21:52
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:38:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
'btrfs fi df
'btrfs fi df' command is currently able to be executed on any file/dir
inside btrfs since it uses btrfs ioctl to get disk usage info.
However it is somewhat confusing for some end users since normally such
command should only be executed on a mount point.
This patch add mount point check in
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:38:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
'btrfs fi df' command is currently able to be executed on any file/dir
inside btrfs since it uses btrfs ioctl to get disk usage info.
However it is somewhat confusing for some end users since normally such
command should only be
David Sterba posted on Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:52:26 +0200 as excerpted:
I disagree here, it's much more convenient to run 'fi df' anywhere and
get the output. The system 'df' command works the same way.
Agreed.
I believe the proposed patch (at least based on its commit comment),
however, simply
