On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 00:25 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/25/14, 12:14 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/24/14, 9:22 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 21:17 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to abort on the number
of mirrors of an extent.
According to the kernel code, the max mirror number of an extent
is 3 not 2:
ctree.h:
On 06/25/2014 10:17 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to abort on the number
of mirrors of an extent.
According to the kernel code, the max mirror number of
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 21:17 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to abort on the number
of mirrors of an extent.
According to the kernel code, the
On 6/24/14, 9:22 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 21:17 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to abort on the number
of mirrors of an extent.
On 6/25/14, 12:14 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/24/14, 9:22 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 21:17 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 6/11/14, 9:25 PM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to
When run chunk-recover on a health btrfs(data profile raid0, with
plenty of data), the program has a chance to abort on the number
of mirrors of an extent.
According to the kernel code, the max mirror number of an extent
is 3 not 2:
ctree.h:BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS 3
