Re: [PATCH 2/5][REPOST][BTRFS-PROGS] Be more verbose when a ioctl returns an error

2011-06-13 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
Hi Hugo, I tryed to rebase this patch on your repo, but it seem that it was already applied. (see commit b3007332100e01ca84c161b6c75f0a414ab4611b)... Let me know how to proceede Regards G.Baroncelli On 06/12/2011 11:51 PM, Hugo Mills wrote: Goffredo - This is missing a S-o-B, and

Re: [PATCH 2/5][REPOST][BTRFS-PROGS] Be more verbose when a ioctl returns an error

2011-06-13 Thread Hugo Mills
Hi, Goffredo, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: I tryed to rebase this patch on your repo, but it seem that it was already applied. (see commit b3007332100e01ca84c161b6c75f0a414ab4611b)... Let me know how to proceede Don't worry, then. I saw the

Re: [PATCH 2/5][REPOST][BTRFS-PROGS] Be more verbose when a ioctl returns an error

2011-06-12 Thread Hugo Mills
Goffredo - This is missing a S-o-B, and is damaged with line-wrapping. If you fix it up and re-send, I can pull into my integration branch so it doesn't get forgotten... Hugo. On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: Hi all, this patch makes the command

[PATCH 2/5][REPOST][BTRFS-PROGS] Be more verbose when a ioctl returns an error

2010-12-05 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
Hi all, this patch makes the command btrfs more verbose when a btrfs ioctl return an error. The error code is printed as text message by the strerror(errno) function. Example: # btrfs subvol create /tmp/1 Create subvolume '/tmp/1' # btrfs subvol create /tmp/1/2