On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:12 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
it also looks that this one is more proper.
I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
it also looks that this one is more proper.
Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong wangc...@zeuux.org
Cc: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
it also looks that this one is more proper.
Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff,
