Re: Confusing output from fi us/df

2016-06-22 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Marc Grondin wrote: > Metadata,single: Size:3.00GiB, Used:1.53GiB Read this as: 3GiB of space on the device is reserved for metadata block group, and 1.53GiB of that is being used. The reservation means that this space can't be used for

Re: Confusing output from fi us/df

2016-06-21 Thread Duncan
Hans van Kranenburg posted on Tue, 21 Jun 2016 02:25:20 +0200 as excerpted: > On 06/21/2016 01:30 AM, Marc Grondin wrote: >> >> I have a btrfs filesystem ontop of a 4x1tb mdraid raid5 array and I've >> been getting confusing output on metadata usage. Seems that even tho >> both data and metadata

Re: Confusing output from fi us/df

2016-06-20 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
On 2016/06/21 8:30, Marc Grondin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > I have a btrfs filesystem ontop of a 4x1tb mdraid raid5 array and I've > been getting confusing output on metadata usage. Seems that even tho > both data and metadata are in single profile metadata is reporting > double the space(as if

Re: Confusing output from fi us/df

2016-06-20 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
Hi, On 06/21/2016 01:30 AM, Marc Grondin wrote: I have a btrfs filesystem ontop of a 4x1tb mdraid raid5 array and I've been getting confusing output on metadata usage. Seems that even tho both data and metadata are in single profile metadata is reporting double the space(as if it was in dupe

Confusing output from fi us/df

2016-06-20 Thread Marc Grondin
Hi everyone, I have a btrfs filesystem ontop of a 4x1tb mdraid raid5 array and I've been getting confusing output on metadata usage. Seems that even tho both data and metadata are in single profile metadata is reporting double the space(as if it was in dupe profile) root@thebeach /h/marcg>