In my opinion, the point is not the default snapshot creation mode but
rather default usage, equals user's expectation.
On 11/30/10, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why zfs
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
(Cc: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net for changes in async snapshots)
This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
readonly snapshot, and you can also set a snapshot readonly/writable
on the fly.
A few
On 11/29/10 21:02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
(Cc: Sage Weils...@newdream.net for changes in async snapshots)
This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
readonly snapshot, and you can also set a snapshot
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM, David Arendt ad...@prnet.org wrote:
On 11/29/10 21:02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
(Cc: Sage Weils...@newdream.net for changes in async snapshots)
This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support.
This may sound excessive as any new concept introduction that late in
development, but readonly/writable snapshots could be further
differentiated by naming the latter clones. This way end-user would
naturally perceive snapsot as read-only PIT fs image, while clone
would naturally refer to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com wrote:
This may sound excessive as any new concept introduction that late in
development, but readonly/writable snapshots could be further
differentiated by naming the latter clones. This way end-user would
naturally
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's just two
different names
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's
