On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:13:25PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:42, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:40, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 19:34, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:20PM
On 2 October 2013 13:52, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:13:25PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:42, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:40, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 19:34, Josef Bacik
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:20PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 2 October 2013 13:52, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:13:25PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:42, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:40, Aastha Mehta
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:47, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:59PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
On 1 October 2013 19:34, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:47, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:59PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef
On 1 October 2013 21:42, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 21:40, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2013 19:34, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:47, Josef Bacik
On 29 September 2013 15:12, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply. That clarifies a lot of things.
I was trying a small test case that opens a file, writes a block of
data, calls fsync and then
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:32:54PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 29 September 2013 15:12, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply. That clarifies a lot of things.
I was trying a small test case
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:32:54PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 29 September 2013 15:12, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:59PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:32:54PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 29 September 2013 15:12, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at
On 30 September 2013 22:47, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:59PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:32:54PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 29 September 2013 15:12, Josef
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:47, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:30:59PM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
On 30 September 2013 22:11, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
Thank you very much for the reply. That clarifies a lot of things.
I was trying a small test case that opens a file, writes a block of
data, calls fsync and then closes the file. If I understand correctly,
fsync would return only after all in-memory buffers have been
committed to disk. I have
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply. That clarifies a lot of things.
I was trying a small test case that opens a file, writes a block of
data, calls fsync and then closes the file. If I understand correctly,
fsync would return only
Hi,
I have few questions regarding logging triggered by calling fsync in BTRFS:
1. If I understand correctly, fsync will call to log entire inode in
the log tree. Does this mean that the data extents are also logged
into the log tree? Are they copied into the log tree, or just
referenced? Are
I am using linux kernel 3.1.10-1.16, just to let you know.
Thanks
On 29 September 2013 01:35, Aastha Mehta aasth...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have few questions regarding logging triggered by calling fsync in BTRFS:
1. If I understand correctly, fsync will call to log entire inode in
the log
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:46:23AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
I am using linux kernel 3.1.10-1.16, just to let you know.
Not that it invalidates the questions below, but that's a really
old kernel. You should update to something recent (3.11, or 3.12-rc2)
as soon as possible. There are major
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:35:15AM +0200, Aastha Mehta wrote:
Hi,
I have few questions regarding logging triggered by calling fsync in BTRFS:
1. If I understand correctly, fsync will call to log entire inode in
the log tree. Does this mean that the data extents are also logged
into the
18 matches
Mail list logo
