On 8/15/14 5:29 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:58:56PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> Christoph had noted that this seemed associated to the problem
>> that the btrfs uses different assignments for st_dev than s_dev,
>> but much as I'd like to see that changed based on
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:29:50AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:58:56PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Christoph had noted that this seemed associated to the problem
that the btrfs uses different assignments for st_dev than s_dev,
but much as I'd like to see that
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:58:56PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Christoph had noted that this seemed associated to the problem
that the btrfs uses different assignments for st_dev than s_dev,
but much as I'd like to see that changed based on discussions so
far its unclear if this is going
