At 06/22/2017 07:31 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2017-06-22 05:37, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use the btrfs-convert tool to convert production data
in ext4 filesystem into btrfs.
What is the stability status of this feature?
As per the below link, this tool is not in
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
> The disks that I need to convert could have anywhere from a few GBs to a
> maximum of 4 TB. I plan to add the btrfs-convert to a script which does a
> software upgrade. (The older version used to store data in extra, we've
> moved
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:07:14PM +0530, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
> I'm planning to use the btrfs-convert tool to convert production data
> in ext4 filesystem into btrfs.
> What is the stability status of this feature?
It has been recently (btrfs-progs 4.6) rewritten nearly from scratch. This
was
>Is this tool supported, at least? Can I use this tool as a part of
>software upgrade to change the data filesystem to btrfs?
Yes its supported. If your existing FS is too large (>22TB) we have a bug for it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194795
AFAIK, there are quite number of
On 2017-06-22 05:37, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to use the btrfs-convert tool to convert production data
in ext4 filesystem into btrfs.
What is the stability status of this feature?
As per the below link, this tool is not in frequent use in latest linux kernels.
Hi,
I'm planning to use the btrfs-convert tool to convert production data
in ext4 filesystem into btrfs.
What is the stability status of this feature?
As per the below link, this tool is not in frequent use in latest linux kernels.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Conversion_from_Ext3
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote (ao):
Edward Ned Harvey wrote (ao):
Is it included in any distributions yet?
Yes, Fedora is one of the releases that has officially supported it
for a while now.
been implemented for Arch Linux, so you might see btrfs being an
option for that in the next
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:14:49 pm Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Is it included in any distributions yet?
You can use it after installation in Ubuntu 10.04. In fact
I'm pretty sure it was enabled in the kernel of 9.10 too.
It's not (yet) an option for installation though.
--
Chris Samuel :
On 07/17/2010 11:11 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:14:49 pm Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Is it included in any distributions yet?
You can use it after installation in Ubuntu 10.04. In fact
I'm pretty sure it was enabled in the kernel of 9.10 too.
It's not (yet) an option for
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
Thank you...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
Thank you...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message
From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:g...@overclocked.net]
On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like
... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
It has been in a good state for quite
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:14:49AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:g...@overclocked.net]
On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey ker...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like
... Is
it usable
a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like
... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
It has been in a good state for quite a while. There seems to be quite
a lot of people who use it on enterprise-grade hardware and servers
that require high reliability.
Is it included in any
Yes, Fedora is one of the releases that has officially supported it
for a while now. Additionally an initrd hook for btrfs has just
been implemented for Arch Linux, so you might see btrfs being an
option for that in the next version of the installer :-)
I also believe that Ubuntu 10.10 is
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:55:26AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
Use it if you don't care about the data on your box or do regular backups. All
of us developers run it on our
Am Freitag 16 Juli 2010, 13:55:26 schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like ... Is
it usable yet, and stuff like that?
Thank you...
I wouldn't suggest to use it in productive environments. Especially as the
error handling is very
I've noticed that the btrfs-unstable-standalone repository hasn't been
updated in over three weeks. It seems all active development is taking
place on btrfs-unstable. What is happening to the
btfs-unstable-standalone repository? Will all future development only be
on btrfs-unstable or is there
18 matches
Mail list logo
