On 03/10/2014 06:02 PM, Avi Miller wrote:
Oracle Linux 6 with the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 2 or Release 3
has production-ready btrfs support. You can even convert your existing CentOS6
boxes across to Oracle Linux 6 in-place without reinstalling:
Hi,
On 14 Mar 2014, at 5:10 am, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
Is there any issue with BTRFS and 32 bit O/S like with ZFS?
We provide some btrfs support with the 32-bit UEK Release 2 on OL6, but we
strongly recommend only using the UEK Release 3 which is 64-bit only.
--
Oracle
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:08:02 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Indeed, testing 3.8.13-26.2.1.el6uek.x86_64 (which is, I believe,
the kernel which Avi referred to) via xfstests, I saw
failures on btrfs/009 and btrfs/022; then the box deadlocked
on btrfs/024. I rebooted resumed, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2014 08:39 PM, Lists wrote:
I'd like to begin testing BTRFS. We'd probably begin roll out in 6
months to a year if testing goes well.
We're currently using CentOS6/64 everywhere, are aware of BTRFS
being a Technology preview in RHEL
On 3/10/14, 8:02 PM, Avi Miller wrote:
On 11 Mar 2014, at 11:39 am, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
Is there a recommended way to do this? Is it anywhere as easy as
ZFSonLinux yum install?
Oracle Linux 6 with the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 2 or
Release 3 has
Hey,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 6:08 am, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
If we're plugging distros... I can also tell you that you can install
upcoming RHEL7 on btrfs if you like, and it has a very up-to-date
btrfs codebase.
Ditto for OL7, for obvious reasons. :)
Indeed, testing
I'd like to begin testing BTRFS. We'd probably begin roll out in 6
months to a year if testing goes well.
We're currently using CentOS6/64 everywhere, are aware of BTRFS being a
Technology preview in RHEL 7beta and would like to begin testing
production-level load testing. We generate about
On 11 Mar 2014, at 11:39 am, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
Is there a recommended way to do this? Is it anywhere as easy as ZFSonLinux
yum install?
Oracle Linux 6 with the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 2 or Release 3
has production-ready btrfs support. You can even convert
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:44:06AM +0530, Hemanth Kumar wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Here's a question -- what are you testing? (Not just here, but in
general, with your test infrastructure)
There are (at least) three classes of tests
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 06:55:09PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:59:06PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
Hi, Hemanth,
Here's a question -- what are you testing? (Not just here, but in
general, with your test infrastructure)
There are (at least) three
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Kumar hemanthkuma...@gmail.com
---
hq.sh | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hq.sh
diff --git a/hq.sh b/hq.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000..6a0a820
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hq.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+#
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:59:06PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
Hi, Hemanth,
Here's a question -- what are you testing? (Not just here, but in
general, with your test infrastructure)
There are (at least) three classes of tests you could be doing:
1) Unit tests, which test
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
254 | 321 ++-
1 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
254 | 321 ++-
1 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
Please ignore this...I forgot to CC xfs, sorry.
thanks,
liubo
On 07/19/2012 05:24 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
254 | 321
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:27:07PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
I think it is better to create a new test than modify the old one.
That way
On 07/20/2012 08:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:27:07PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds more cases in 254 for testing btrfs snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
I think it is better to create a new
17 matches
Mail list logo
