Am 17.09.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Chris Mason:
No problem, the original patch looked right to me too. We're getting
closer to rc6, I think at this point I'll revert the original patch
until the next merge window. Then we can step back and nail down
exactly what is going on.
running
On 09/17/2014 05:47 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
Hi Chris,
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index e9676a4..1224b61 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char
*path,
Hi Anand
On 15/09/2014 18:42, Anand Jain wrote:
The patch fixes the issue, although it took a little tweaking to get it
to apply cleanly.
I'm working with Sam. This is what I applied, and it works:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 340a92d..2c87b72 100644
---
On 09/15/2014 12:09 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for reporting. Can you apply the following diff
on top of 3.17rc5 and check if it helps.
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index e9676a4..1224b61 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++
Stefan,
Can you pls send me the output for
cat /etc/fstab | egrep btrfs
cat /proc/self/mounts | egrep btrfs
mount | egrep btrfs
Thanks, Anand
On 17/09/2014 05:08, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 15.09.2014 um 19:42 schrieb Anand Jain:
Sam,
In the above context, Can you
Hi!
I'm having an issue with the 3.17rc5 kernel which prevents having
multiple subvolumes of the same disk mounted.
I'm not sure exactly the cause. I thought it might be because in my
system the root file system is itself a subvolume of the disk I'm trying
to mount. But if I create a second
On 09/15/2014 11:13 AM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
Hi!
I'm having an issue with the 3.17rc5 kernel which prevents having
multiple subvolumes of the same disk mounted.
I'm not sure exactly the cause. I thought it might be because in my
system the root file system is itself a subvolume of the
Sam,
Thanks for reporting. Can you apply the following diff
on top of 3.17rc5 and check if it helps.
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index e9676a4..1224b61 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static noinline int
Logs from Sam, tells the problem clearly. mount is using
/dev/sda, but mount error message and kernel is using /dev/vda.
--
$ mount /dev/sda /home -t btrfs -o subvol=/state/home,defaults,rw,noatime
mount: /dev/vda is already mounted or /home busy
/dev/vda is
Hi Anand
On 15/09/14 17:09, Anand Jain wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for reporting. Can you apply the following diff
on top of 3.17rc5 and check if it helps.
The patch fixes the issue, although it took a little tweaking to get it
to apply cleanly.
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
On 15/09/14 17:42, Anand Jain wrote:
Logs from Sam, tells the problem clearly. mount is using
/dev/sda, but mount error message and kernel is using /dev/vda.
--
$ mount /dev/sda /home -t btrfs -o subvol=/state/home,defaults,rw,noatime
mount: /dev/vda is already mounted
Hi Sam,
Thanks for verifying.
On 16/09/2014 01:13, Sam Thursfield wrote:
Hi Anand
On 15/09/14 17:09, Anand Jain wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for reporting. Can you apply the following diff
on top of 3.17rc5 and check if it helps.
The patch fixes the issue, although it took a little tweaking
The patch fixes the issue, although it took a little tweaking to get it
to apply cleanly.
Sam,
In the above context, Can you pls share the btrfs fi show output ?
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
This diff on top of 3.17rc5 also fixes the issue on my box (encrypted
/home subvolume)
Xavier
Hi Sam,
Thanks for verifying.
On 16/09/2014 01:13, Sam Thursfield wrote:
Hi Anand
On 15/09/14 17:09, Anand Jain wrote:
Sam,
Thanks for reporting. Can you apply the following diff
on top
14 matches
Mail list logo
