On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
== Changing RAID levels ==
We need ioctls to change between different raid levels. Some of these
are quite easy -- e.g. for RAID0 to RAID1, we just halve the available
bytes on the fs, then queue a rebalance.
Can we
Bart Kus wrote:
On 11/17/2010 10:07 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 11/17/2010 05:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 19:07, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Since BTRFS is already doing some relatively radical things, I would like to
suggest that RAID5 and RAID6 be deemed obsolete. RAID5 isn't safely usable
for arrays bigger than about 5TB with disks that have a specified error
Bart Noordervliet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 19:07, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Since BTRFS is already doing some relatively radical things, I would like to
suggest that RAID5 and RAID6 be deemed obsolete. RAID5 isn't safely usable
for arrays bigger than about 5TB with disks that
On 18/11/10 15:31, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 19:07, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Since BTRFS is already doing some relatively radical things, I would like to
suggest that RAID5 and RAID6 be deemed obsolete. RAID5 isn't safely usable
for arrays bigger than about
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:19:45PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
Chris Mason has posted a bunch of interesting updates to the
Project_ideas wiki page. If you're interested in working on any
of these, feel free to speak up and ask for more information if
you need it. Here are the new
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 15:31, Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:19:45PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
== Changing RAID levels ==
We need ioctls to change between different raid levels. Some of these
are quite easy -- e.g. for RAID0 to RAID1, we just halve the
Le 17 novembre 2010 à 16:12, Bart Noordervliet a écrit:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
discussed previously in the Raid1 with 3 drives thread of March this
year? I.e. abandon the burdened raid*
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Bart Noordervliet
b...@noordervliet.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 15:31, Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:19:45PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
== Changing RAID levels ==
We need ioctls to change between different raid
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
discussed previously in the Raid1 with 3 drives thread of March this
year? I.e. abandon the
On 11/17/2010 05:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
discussed previously in the Raid1 with 3 drives thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17.11.2010 18:56, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:47PM +0100, Andreas Philipp wrote:
On 17.11.2010 18:56, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy,
On 11/17/2010 10:07 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 11/17/2010 05:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:12:29PM +0100, Bart Noordervliet wrote:
Can I suggest we combine this new RAID level management with a
modernisation of the terminology for storage redundancy, as has been
discussed
Hi,
Chris Mason has posted a bunch of interesting updates to the
Project_ideas wiki page. If you're interested in working on any
of these, feel free to speak up and ask for more information if
you need it. Here are the new sections, for the curious:
== Block group reclaim ==
The split between
15 matches
Mail list logo
