On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:07:10PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > - mount -o recovery still hung
> > - mount -o ro did not hang though
> One tip here specifically, if you had to reboot during a balance and the FS
> hangs when it mounts, try mounting with `-o skip_balance`. That should
>
On 2018-06-25 12:07, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:58:44PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
In your situation, I would run "btrfs pause ", wait to hear from
a btrfs developer, and not use the volume whatsoever in the meantime.
I would say this is probably good advice. I
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:24:37PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> >> output hasn't changed for over 36 hours, unless you've got an insanely slow
> >> storage array, that's extremely unusual (it should only be moving at most
> >> 3GB of data per chunk)).
> >
> > I didn't hear from any
On 06/25/2018 06:07 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:58:44PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>> In your situation, I would run "btrfs pause ", wait to hear from
>>> a btrfs developer, and not use the volume whatsoever in the meantime.
>> I would say this is probably good
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:58:44PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > In your situation, I would run "btrfs pause ", wait to hear from
> > a btrfs developer, and not use the volume whatsoever in the meantime.
> I would say this is probably good advice. I don't really know what's going
> on
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:58:44 -0400 as
excerpted:
> That said, I would question the value of repacking chunks that are
> already more than half full. Anything above a 50% usage filter
> generally takes a long time, and has limited value in most cases (higher
> values
On 2018-06-19 12:30, james harvey wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 06:00:55AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
So, I ran this:
gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs balance start -dusage=60 -v . &
[1] 24450
Dumping filters: flags 0x1, state 0x0, force
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 06:00:55AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> So, I ran this:
>> gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs balance start -dusage=60 -v . &
>> [1] 24450
>> Dumping filters: flags 0x1, state 0x0, force is off
>> DATA (flags 0x2):
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 06:00:55AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> So, I ran this:
> gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs balance start -dusage=60 -v . &
> [1] 24450
> Dumping filters: flags 0x1, state 0x0, force is off
> DATA (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=60
> gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# while :; do
So, I ran this:
gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs balance start -dusage=60 -v . &
[1] 24450
Dumping filters: flags 0x1, state 0x0, force is off
DATA (flags 0x2): balancing, usage=60
gargamel:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# while :; do btrfs balance status .; sleep 60; done
0 out of about 0 chunks balanced (0
10 matches
Mail list logo
